California stakeholders unite against AB 928 citing widespread opposition

April 30, 2025 | California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California

Thanks to Scribe from Workplace AI and Family Portal , all articles about California are free for you to enjoy throughout 2025!


California stakeholders unite against AB 928 citing widespread opposition

This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

The Assembly Appropriations Committee of the California State Assembly convened on April 30, 2025, to discuss various legislative matters, with a significant focus on Assembly Bill 928 (AB 928). The meeting featured a series of public comments predominantly opposing the bill.

The session began with Efrain Gutierrez expressing his opposition to AB 928, setting the tone for a wave of dissent from numerous speakers. Charles Philip Rutledge from Tulare County, Rafael Rodriguez from Marysville, and Jesse Olguin were among the early voices against the bill, each articulating their concerns.

As the meeting progressed, a steady stream of individuals, including local business owners and community members, voiced their opposition. Notable mentions included Alejandro Juarez Garcia, Adrian Guadiana, and Cubert Hernandez, all of whom highlighted their disapproval of AB 928. The opposition came from various regions, including Madera County, Fresno, and Sonoma County, indicating widespread concern across different communities.

Several representatives from agricultural and poultry associations also joined the chorus of dissent. Jim Grama, representing Farmers Warehouse Company, and Catherine Plummer, a preservation breeder of exhibition poultry, both strongly opposed the bill, emphasizing its potential negative impact on their industries.

The meeting concluded with a clear consensus among the speakers against AB 928, reflecting significant community resistance. The committee will likely need to consider these public sentiments as they move forward with discussions on the bill. The next steps regarding AB 928 remain to be determined, but the strong opposition signals a challenging path ahead for its proponents.

Converted from Assembly Appropriations Committee (1) meeting on April 30, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Family Portal
    Family Portal