Georgetown Code Enforcement seeks two additional officers to manage growing complaint volume

In the heart of Georgetown City Hall, city officials gathered for a pivotal budget workshop, where discussions centered on the future of code enforcement in the community. As the meeting unfolded, the urgency of addressing public safety and property maintenance became clear, with city leaders emphasizing the need for enhanced resources to meet the growing demands of a rapidly expanding population.

The presentation, led by the Director of Code Enforcement, highlighted the department's current operational framework, which relies heavily on interlocal funding agreements shared among Georgetown, Scott County, Sadieville, and Stamping Ground. With a projected revenue of $377,508 for the upcoming year, the department faces a stark contrast between its income and projected expenditures of $640,923. This gap underscores the pressing need for additional personnel, as the department currently operates with only two code enforcement officers to cover a vast area of approximately 300 square miles, serving nearly 60,000 residents.

The Director outlined the department's dual focus on reactive complaint investigations and proactive community engagement. Daily, the office receives 20 to 30 calls regarding various code violations, from unsafe structures to illegal dumping. The current staffing model, which includes a senior officer and an administrative assistant, is insufficient to manage the increasing volume of calls, projected to rise by 10% annually as the city continues to grow.

A key point of discussion was the request for two additional code enforcement officers, aimed at bolstering the department's capacity to respond effectively to the community's needs. The Director emphasized that while Georgetown generates the highest volume of calls, the department is committed to providing equitable service across all areas, including Scott County and its neighboring communities.

As the meeting progressed, council members engaged in discussions about the strengths and weaknesses of the code enforcement office. While the team boasts experienced personnel and strong community trust, challenges such as limited resources and a reactive approach to enforcement were acknowledged. The Director expressed optimism about future opportunities, including the implementation of new technology for better data tracking and community education initiatives to prevent code violations before they occur.

In closing, the Director reiterated the importance of proactive measures in maintaining the city's livability and safety. With the community's rapid development posing both opportunities and threats, the call for increased staffing and resources resonated strongly among council members. As Georgetown continues to evolve, the effectiveness of its code enforcement efforts will be crucial in shaping a safe and appealing environment for all residents.