Forensic expert details gunshot wound evidence in Dodson case

In a recent court session, critical forensic details emerged regarding the gunshot wound of victim Dodson Graham, as expert testimony highlighted the nature of the injuries sustained. Dr. Hiffer, a forensic expert, provided insights into the characteristics of the wound, indicating that it was consistent with a close-range handgun shooting.

Dr. Hiffer explained the difference between stippling and soot, two key indicators in gunshot wounds. Soot, which is burnt gunpowder, can leave a black ring of discoloration on the skin or clothing when fired from close range. In contrast, stippling consists of unburnt gunpowder that causes small abrasions upon contact. The presence of both soot and stippling in Graham's case suggests that the gun was likely pressed against his skin when fired, indicating a contact shot.

Despite the detailed analysis, Dr. Hiffer could not determine the caliber of the bullet or the type of firearm used, as no projectile was recovered from the body. He clarified that the wound was singular and consistent with a handgun rather than a shotgun, which would have produced a different type of injury.

The courtroom proceedings were briefly paused for a recess, allowing jurors to reflect on the testimony before the next witness was called. This session underscores the importance of forensic evidence in understanding the circumstances surrounding violent incidents, as the details provided by experts can significantly influence the case's outcome. The trial continues to unfold, with further testimonies expected to shed more light on the events leading to Graham's death.