New Hampshire legislators debate product liability bill for Sig Sauer firearms

A heated debate unfolded during the New Hampshire Senate Judiciary meeting on April 29, 2025, as lawmakers discussed a controversial bill that could grant immunity to gun manufacturers embroiled in legal disputes. The discussion centered around a specific manufacturer, Sig Sauer, which has faced lawsuits related to alleged defects in its firearms sold to law enforcement agencies.

One senator expressed concern over the legislature's potential interference in ongoing legal matters, questioning the appropriateness of providing immunity to a company with documented product issues. "Why are we inserting ourselves into a lawsuit... and giving them product immunity?" the senator asked, highlighting the risks of protecting a manufacturer that has already faced scrutiny for its products.

The debate intensified as senators weighed the implications of the bill, which would limit liability for manufacturers if certain safety features were not included in their firearms. Supporters argued that this legislation would encourage manufacturers to remain in New Hampshire and foster a favorable business environment. "If they're making a gun... and there's no defect, then they shouldn't be fearing lawsuits in New Hampshire," one senator stated, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach to liability.

Opponents, however, cautioned against singling out the gun industry for favorable treatment, suggesting that it could set a precedent for other manufacturers. "We're picking a winner... to have favorable legislation for one industry over all other New Hampshire made products," another senator remarked, urging caution in the legislative process.

Ultimately, the committee voted in favor of the bill, but not without significant dissent. The discussions highlighted the ongoing tension between supporting local businesses and ensuring accountability for product safety, a debate that is likely to continue as the bill moves forward in the legislative process.