The Assembly Floor Session held on May 1, 2025, in California focused on the proposed amendments to Assembly Bill 379, aimed at enhancing protections for minors, specifically 16 and 17-year-olds, against human trafficking. Assemblymember Schulz initiated the discussion by emphasizing the need for strong legislative measures to safeguard young victims and to clarify existing laws regarding the prosecution of individuals involved in trafficking minors.
Schulz highlighted that current California law already imposes felony charges for contacting minors for sexual purposes, referencing Penal Code section 288.3. He expressed concern over misinformation circulating about the bill and reiterated the importance of a thorough legislative process that includes input from all stakeholders to ensure effective solutions for survivors.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The debate intensified as Assemblymember DeMaio criticized the bill, accusing it of merely offering "lip service" to survivors while potentially enabling predatory behavior. He referenced previous legislation, such as SB 145, which he argued undermined protections for minors. DeMaio's remarks sparked a heated exchange regarding the implications of the proposed amendments and the perceived failure to adequately protect young victims.
Assemblymember Krell contributed to the discussion by stressing the legal recognition that minors involved in prostitution are victims, not criminals. She pointed out the need for clarity in the law to ensure that buyers of sexual services from minors face felony charges. Krell expressed her willingness to support the bill if it unequivocally treated 16 and 17-year-olds as victims deserving of protection.
The session underscored the complexities surrounding the legislation, with members voicing strong opinions on the balance between protecting minors and addressing the nuances of existing laws. The discussions highlighted the ongoing struggle to ensure that California's legal framework effectively safeguards vulnerable populations while navigating the political landscape.
As the session progressed, the assembly members continued to deliberate on the amendments, with a focus on the implications for both survivors and the legal system. The outcome of this legislative effort remains to be seen, as the assembly weighs the proposed changes against the backdrop of public concern and advocacy for stronger protections for minors against human trafficking.