[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6570973,"mediaKeyId","3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7","parentId",3180967,"title","Planning commission upholds environmental finding for proposed 570 Market hotel; entitlements delayed for design follow-up","audioSeconds",5654,"startMs",6123000,"endMs",11777000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7&start=6123&end=11777","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7/thumbnail_6123000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6570973/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/Planning-commission-upholds-environmental-finding-for-proposed-570-Market-hotel-entitlements-delayed-for-design-follow-up","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6570973-152eaeb7d48acd81be4b12b710d3cbf1/orig.mp4?Expires=1773625879&Signature=ZuLY-DO-lPx1shDTfKD6hbawzjUkZKLrQp9pwR0xur8GbEVmFifWO5BDrfZ1fFo40fazAnTZCyztzXyrQfvMQj1iovew42yh68fyRUjV36tgm5mltQFu~eXP9GE6mZ6gVqOv-CgKUcRfgKXd-pj73XdG6sCKuC49b5zDHLwrvCs7HU7m9aQR9P2bgVgL7GNyoszwdrNYNjdFEKcwLwrOrVKsBeGLsb2kvGndq833GUZFndN4agr8gjNaQN9Ipv1jpEEAgjz2Iu5QiqcebXnxORoY5QrkVwoPV68WVSyBPqpG7~6hAdyXKio7HRV6kNdCDy2BJbzinHi8-u93smTr4Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of San Francisco","date","2025-05-01T00:00:00Z","article","The San Francisco Planning Commission on May 1 voted 5 to 2 to affirm the Planning Department's preliminary mitigated negative declaration (PMND) for a proposed 29-story hotel at 570 Market Street, rejecting appeals from nearby property owners who argued the project could cause significant vibration, settlement and historic-preservation impacts.

The project would replace two low-rise commercial buildings with a 300-foot, 29-story hotel containing about 211 rooms, a publicly accessible terrace and no off-street vehicle parking. Planning staff and the project sponsor said technical review and mitigation measures would reduce construction impacts to less-than-significant levels.

What the commission decided: After hearing technical rebuttals and two appellant presentations, commissioners upheld the PMND, finding that the department's technical studies and proposed mitigation measures provided substantial support for the environmental determination. The vote to affirm the PMND was 5 to 2, with Commissioners Imperial and Moore casting the no votes.

Why appellants objected: Lawyers for owners of adjacent properties argued the PMND's analyses left critical questions unanswered about construction vibration, soil settlement and noise, particularly because the proposed tower would stand within a foot of some neighboring buildings. Richard Drury, counsel for one appellant, told the commission the proximity raised \"a fair argument\" for significant effects on historic structures and said the PMND deferred key engineering review to later stages. Structural and acoustical consultants for the appellants submitted studies concluding that vibration and noise could exceed commonly used guidance thresholds and that deferred mitigation would be insufficient.

Planning staff's response: The Planning Department's environmental team said the PMND conservatively analyzed vibration and noise and proposed specific mitigation, including a project-specific vibration monitoring and management plan, pre-construction surveys, monitoring during construction, and preservation-professional oversight. Staff also noted that detailed structural and geotechnical review is performed by the Department of Building Inspection at the permit level and that state and local code review and AB-111/AB-82 design review procedures would require independent engineering review for a tall building.

Public comment and labor support: Labor representatives and trade unions urged the commission to support the project for job creation and apprenticeships; several unions including Local 22 (carpenters), IBEW Local 6 and others told commissioners the project would support union construction jobs.

Entitlements continued: After affirming the PMND, the commission then considered project entitlements (downtown project authorization, conditional use authorization and a zoning variance for elevator penthouse height). Commissioners expressed a range of design concerns, including the building's massing relative to adjacent historic buildings, shadowing, the alignment of light wells, the proximity of windows and loading operations on narrow Sutter Street. The commission voted 5 to 2 to continue entitlement deliberation and directed the project sponsor to return July 10 with refined materials, clearer three-dimensional context renderings showing adjacent buildings (including 44 Montgomery and the Chancery Building), and targeted design adjustments addressing light wells and facade modulation. Commissioners asked for a clear explanation of why alternatives (such as moving the building core) were not feasible.

Outcome and next steps: The PMND affirmation means staff concluded an EIR is not required, but the project cannot proceed to final approvals until the entitlement hearings are resumed and the commission resolves the design and variance requests on July 10. The commission also asked the sponsor to present: (1) more three-dimensional context images showing the hotel relative to adjacent historic resources; (2) refined analysis of construction vibration and mitigation procedures in consultation with DBI; and (3) revised facade treatments and materials studies that respond to commissioner concerns about massing and the perceived institutional look of the design.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of San Francisco - Video Open Video Only in Windows Media Player - May 01, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The San Francisco Planning Commission on May 1 affirmed the Planning Department's preliminary mitigated negative declaration for a proposed 29-story hotel at 570 Market Street, rejecting appeals from nearby owners about vibration, noise and historic-preservation risk, then continued the entitlement hearings to July 10 for additional design work.","taxTitle","San Francisco City, San Francisco County, California","taxId",5751,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6570975,"Planning Commission backs amnesty for properties tied to DBI audit, with limits for flagged contractors",328,2772000,3100000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7&start=2772&end=3100","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7/thumbnail_2772000.jpg","/articles/6570975/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/Planning-Commission-backs-amnesty-for-properties-tied-to-DBI-audit-with-limits-for-flagged-contractors","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6570975-6ed788fe49cf43aa066c732dca6f15da/orig.mp4?Expires=1773625879&Signature=VE7QDDOhBE047ZGzXYbCuzynzjqLDHJn9VfSXva5p0mlJkGZYLo3Gl4eLR6DRrLTBVaZEyH6yTEJ5Gn7UP3lkI5OVYK5kpslAv510CZtQr~Xo00leU7LrhL9jlgf784QtAD2p5JgDmvYfpqlbJogd7MbJK91SBZvGav6RFGaSoK5KO~gvnU46sPkp9x8FGb7v2PgjTMUwQQu4t-qOdk-9t4dnBwTca98sMYUsifvFc6iUlCe8CsrMD836csKXxUOa7bRHQTQt99RNgvXJKinovT4pGzmS0mL9qKAzi5b0jdJnovT3uhOKm0SVAXUYmhNoOVfi6yz5KRhILKNopE5XA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Planning Commission on May 1 recommended approval of an ordinance sponsored by Supervisor Matt Mandelmann that would establish an amnesty program for properties identified by the Department of Building Inspection's internal quality-control audit.

The ordinance would waive specified planning-code violations, refund fees already paid by property owners who bring violations to the city's attention, and waive certain zoning or conditional-use requirements for properties that were caught up in fraudulent or improper permitting tied to former building professionals. Supervisor Mandelmann told the commission the measure \"will provide relief to scores of property owners who were unwittingly and through no fault of their own swept up in the sad and sorry saga of Bernie Curran and Rodrigo Santos.\" His office said the audit identified nearly 5,500 properties associated with the two men.

Why it matters: DBI's audit followed criminal prosecutions of a former DBI inspector and a private engineer who, the city says, submitted falsified documents and accepted gratuities. Owners found to have inherited unpermitted work faced large remediation bills, in some cases tens of thousands of dollars for architects, permit fees and repairs. The ordinance aims to reduce that financial burden for owners who were not party to the fraud while preserving building-safety requirements.

What the commission did: Commissioners voted 6 to 1 to recommend approval, with a specific condition added during the hearing. The commission directed that entities on DBI's expanded compliance control list\u0000a public list of applicants and design professionals found to have falsified plans or exceeded approved work\u0000be ineligible to act as applicants or as the design professional of record for owners seeking amnesty. The amendment was offered by several commissioners as a guardrail to prevent developers or design professionals previously disciplined by DBI from benefiting from the program.

Public concerns and staff response: DBI staff and the sponsor acknowledged the legislation would not waive building-code life-safety obligations; property owners would still have to bring work up to building-code standards and obtain any construction permits required to abate structural or safety violations. Tate Hannah of DBI said the department paused some enforcement while the legislation moved through the process to avoid creating undue anxiety for owners who bought recently renovated properties without knowledge of past fraud. Public commenters supported the concept but urged the city to publish the specific list of properties that would be eligible and to explain how refunds and fee waivers would be handled.

Vote and next steps: The commission's recommendation (motion moved by not specified, second not specified in the public record) passed 6 to 1. Recorded votes were: Commissioner Campbell \u00009Aye\u00009; Commissioner McGarry \u00009Aye\u00009; Commissioner Williams \u00009Aye\u00009; Commissioner Braun \u00009Aye\u00009; Commissioner Imperial \u00009Aye\u00009; Commissioner Moore \u00009No\u00009; President So \u00009Aye\u00009. With the commission's recommendation, the ordinance moves back to the Board of Supervisors' land-use committee for further review and final action.

What remains unresolved: Several commissioners and public commenters asked the sponsor and DBI to produce publicly the audit's property list and to clarify how many notices of violation (NOVs) have been fully investigated. DBI staff said the agency has completed its internal research and categorized properties by tiers but paused certain NOVs while the ordinance worked through the legislative process. Deputy legislative staff and the sponsor said they will provide additional outreach to affected owners and more detailed cost estimates for refunds and waived fees before the Board of Supervisors takes action.

Ending: The commission's approved amendment narrows eligibility to block applicants who appear on DBI's enforcement watch list from acting as the applicant or design professional of record for amnesty claims; owners not involved with those flagged firms remain eligible. The measure now proceeds toward the Board of Supervisors as the city balances relief for innocent owners against safeguards against repeat improper practice.","The San Francisco Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend approval of an ordinance creating a limited amnesty program for properties identified in the Department of Building Inspection\u0000(DBI) internal quality-control audit, but added a condition excluding applicants who use contractors on the department's expanded compliance control list.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6570967,"Planning commission approves India Basin Block H1 100%-affordable building with design conditions",2451,11872000,14323000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7&start=11872&end=14323","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7/thumbnail_11872000.jpg","/articles/6570967/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/Planning-commission-approves-India-Basin-Block-H1-100-affordable-building-with-design-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6570967-6365735d071964a62cf385432ea49340/orig.mp4?Expires=1773625879&Signature=QE96ydyfK7XyaNXc-B6QD9SfxbRkL~JU9w23eKe6Ek2Sz~~SLtcmSVn0w4mjjPEssHiYy1NjACoaBZoGJbBlVM-xt9JlCFVrqHnOvvV8x0wQ-5DOfqUe1LRVHmASzT5wqFVC8PSrcg8COBQdsW7pb1ZRJuWQMXI9xFmK8VFXUlnjA6jNvYag9e5b7MhpzCoWSvmeq8TpDbVupODIrV8Q14cNH4VWm1~fqi~xTEnRIlB~3mdtbKWBvBs9h0kmUflpkY~Fvlfa64cMQ3OwUdq7AI3f~1bN6TXIZdthzXHq1LkMqtHYgjixJPMgBHqVNBxVFIiaACf90SMcS7Us743Ctw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Planning Commission on May 1 approved major modifications to the India Basin Special Use District design guidelines to permit a six-story, 179-unit, 100%-affordable building on Parcel H1A, a hillside site in the larger India Basin mixed-use redevelopment. The vote was unanimous.

Project and requested changes: The proposed building would include 179 affordable family units plus two manager units, ground-floor residential support spaces and about 3,200 square feet of retail frontage on New Hudson Avenue. The sponsor requested major modifications from three SUD standards: the percentage of required active frontages along the New Hudson frontage, the top-floor step-back requirement and a minor variance for a retail frontage longer than the guideline's 75-foot recommendation.

Why modifications were requested: The sponsor said site geometry and technical requirements (including transformer and electrical-room placement, garage access, and the need for two separate residential cores) reduce the length of continuous active retail frontage the plan can provide along New Hudson West. The sponsor also argued that a six-story building without a seventh-floor setback yields better perceived height and pedestrian comfort than a seven-story building with a step-back, and that a six-story structural approach (a single level of concrete podium with wood-frame upper floors) is substantially more cost-effective for a 100%-affordable project.

Commission action and conditions: After discussion the commission approved the requested major modifications, finding that the departures remain consistent with the SUD's objectives and that mitigation and urban-design measures compensate for the departures. Commissioners directed the sponsor and staff to continue refining facade treatments, to adopt a lighter, less institutional exterior palette, and to develop a differentiated top-floor datum or other modest modulation so the building reads with human-scaled elements at the top. The commission specifically asked for: more articulated facade treatment to avoid a monolithic institutional appearance; design options for activating non-retail frontage (art, landscaping or green walls); and a detailed plan showing how retail and lobby access would operate with PG&E transformer and garage requirements.

Public comment: Build Inc., housing advocates and labor groups urged approval and highlighted the project's role in unlocking master-plan infrastructure financing and meeting affordable-housing milestones at India Basin. The project sponsor emphasized affordability, large-family unit designs (many two-bedrooms or larger), and the developer's experience delivering similar 100%-affordable projects.

Next steps: The commission's approval allows the project to proceed to building-permit review and final design approvals, subject to the more detailed facade and public-realm refinements the commission requested.","The commission approved major modifications to India Basin Block H1A on a hillside parcel to allow a six-story, 179-unit, 100%-affordable building, but directed the sponsor to refine facade materials and a top-level datum and to work with staff on color and public-realm treatments.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6570971,"Planning commission approves revised 3700 California development with senior housing, 456 new units",1573,9967000,11540000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7&start=9967&end=11540","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3180967-4612b3df11715e4b8547f590c9e330a7/thumbnail_9967000.jpg","/articles/6570971/San-Francisco-City/San-Francisco-County/California/Planning-commission-approves-revised-3700-California-development-with-senior-housing-456-new-units","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6570971-2c8bc48e68b080587a7c3ab4675e9b05/orig.mp4?Expires=1773625879&Signature=V91Rl0cFSRpGpALk8F~zhCP1XjgAqE6d6iXxoUE~w9XOooL4b5JNXxiRzyNLf7U3CMZxvR37GKVMTeEUq-0KLoVynsdWySI5Idw7CuGXabTP7f58ndj0iGpbz5BfDaZgZRSAvrxTrOCbxfeiS7n13cLUno2IzP2-nJWKUKcjAHc3bsfrGU6tElR-k65Avs5zPoT9YNcyNQSGgEmLTUXVt5kpkYiyD7pkuQcVhDp18niiCzc4vffIDpfc~DYwal7UdjFrKjhHVl9dp-p3CbECd9PCGyNS8kzIHybYIOdBq3aIt8hprJS9bW9OOddLL1F3TdW~df-7CxVotewT~wsyNQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The San Francisco Planning Commission unanimously approved on May 1 a modified plan for the redevelopment of the former California Pacific Medical Center campus at 3700 California Street in Presidio Heights.

The revised proposal retains and renovates Marshall Hale (3698 California), adds 15 new single-family homes on fee parcels and consolidates earlier plans for 31 buildings into a smaller number of larger buildings, increasing total housing from the prior approval's 264 units to 456 new dwelling units overall. The project adds 74 assisted-living and memory-care units in a mixed-use building on Block C and includes a ground-level restaurant intended to provide neighborhood-serving commercial space.

Why it matters: The site is a 4.9-acre redevelopment in a central, well-connected neighborhood near Laurel Village and the Presidio. The amendment balances larger-scale multifamily housing and single-family parcels while preserving and adaptively reusing a key historic hospital building as part of a mixed-use senior facility.

Findings and approvals: Planning staff concluded the proposed modifications were within the scope of the project's previously certified Environmental Impact Report and administratively approved an addendum. The commission approved the modified planned-unit development and the requested conditional-use authorizations and design adjustments. Staff noted the revised proposal would remain within the zoning height limits and that the revised mitigation-monitoring program had been updated.

Public reaction and outreach: The sponsor, developer Prado Group, and local neighborhood groups said they had engaged in community meetings over the previous year. Support letters came from neighborhood organizations and labor and housing advocates; a few comments asked the sponsor to preserve mature street trees and to coordinate outreach on construction timing. The Planning Department said the sponsor will provide additional details on tree impacts and construction phasing as conditions of approval.

Outcome: The commission voted 7-0 to approve the amended PUD and associated entitlements with standard conditions and updated mitigation and monitoring requirements. The sponsor said it would move toward final permitting and construction on a revised schedule.","The commission unanimously approved modifications to the long-running 3700 California Street (former CPMC site) plan, expanding the overall housing count and adding a 74-unit senior residential care component while preserving the historic Marshall Hale building and approving design changes and conditions.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning commission upholds environmental finding for proposed 570 Market hotel; entitlements delayed for design follow-up

Planning Commission backs amnesty for properties tied to DBI audit, with limits for flagged contractors

Planning commission approves India Basin Block H1 100%-affordable building with design conditions

Planning commission approves revised 3700 California development with senior housing, 456 new units