Coroner defends evidence retention amid family claims in death investigation

Tensions flared during the Northampton County Council meeting on May 1, 2025, as a heated discussion unfolded regarding the handling of sensitive evidence by the coroner's office. The focus was on a resident's claims about the retention of personal property, specifically a suicide note, which the family wanted returned.

The coroner defended the practice of retaining such evidence, stating, "My first responsibility is to the decedent," emphasizing that collecting evidence is crucial for investigating deaths. He explained that the suicide note is considered evidence and is retained indefinitely to address any future disputes about the circumstances of the death. "We have people that come forth and contest how or why a person died," he noted, highlighting the importance of the note in clarifying such cases.

The coroner also addressed accusations of miscommunication with the family, asserting that he had not made any promises regarding the return of the note. He provided a letter from the Pennsylvania State Coroner's Association solicitor, reinforcing his legal right to retain the evidence. "We've been doing that practice for 33 years," he stated, underscoring the established protocol in such sensitive matters.

While the family expressed frustration over the situation, the coroner maintained that he had acted appropriately and transparently throughout the investigation. The discussion underscored the delicate balance between legal procedures and the emotional needs of grieving families, a topic that resonated deeply within the council chamber. As the meeting concluded, the implications of this case highlighted the ongoing challenges faced by officials in managing sensitive evidence while addressing community concerns.