California discusses repeal of TB 133 to reduce toxic flame retardants in furniture

The Bureau of Household Goods and Services in California held a public hearing on May 5, 2025, to discuss proposed amendments to flammability standards, specifically the repeal of TB 133. This standard has been criticized for its reliance on chemical flame retardants, which many experts argue pose health risks without significantly improving fire safety.

During the meeting, several speakers, including representatives from the San Francisco Department of Environment and the Center for Environmental Health, expressed strong support for repealing TB 133. They highlighted that the standard has led to increased use of harmful flame retardants in furniture, which can produce toxic gases when burned. These chemicals have been linked to serious health issues, including cancer, particularly among firefighters and vulnerable populations.

Megan Kalsman from the San Francisco Department of Environment noted that TB 133 does not effectively address the primary causes of fire, such as smolder ignition sources. In contrast, the newer TB 117-2013 standard focuses on smolder flammability and allows for safer manufacturing practices without toxic additives. This shift is seen as a necessary step to enhance public safety while reducing health risks associated with flame retardants.

Donald Lucas, a combustion scientist, emphasized the need for consistent national standards to simplify compliance and enhance safety across states. Other advocates, including representatives from the Breast Cancer Prevention Partners and the Environmental Working Group, echoed concerns about the health impacts of flame retardants, urging the Bureau to move forward with the repeal.

The proposed repeal of TB 133 is viewed as a significant step towards improving fire safety standards while protecting public health. The Bureau is expected to consider the feedback from this hearing as it moves forward with the regulatory process.