Citizen Calls for Extended Public Comment at Washington County Board Meeting

In the heart of Washington County, Maryland, the Board of County Commissioners meeting on April 8, 2025, unfolded with a mix of spirited public commentary and procedural discussions that highlighted ongoing tensions between officials and residents. As the meeting commenced, the atmosphere was charged with anticipation, reflecting the community's eagerness to engage in local governance.

One of the key topics raised was the new policy allowing the presiding officer to extend the 30-minute public comment period. A resident emphasized the importance of this flexibility, urging that it should be utilized to ensure all voices are heard, regardless of whether individuals had signed up in advance. This call for inclusivity resonated with many attendees, who expressed concerns about the accessibility of the meeting process.

However, the resident also pointed out discrepancies in the meeting's scheduling information on the county website, which incorrectly listed the start time as 9:00 AM instead of the actual 8:00 AM. This confusion, they argued, could deter citizen participation and create the impression that the county was not fully transparent about its proceedings. The resident suggested that when the meeting reconvened after a recess, the board should clarify that they were resuming rather than starting anew, to avoid misleading those tuning in late.

The meeting took a more contentious turn when another speaker, Sean Court, criticized the county's relationship with local media, specifically Antietam Cable. Court claimed that the county's assertion that the cable company had cut their feed due to inappropriate language was unfounded. Instead, he suggested that the lack of viewership stemmed from the meetings being perceived as unengaging. His remarks drew laughter from the audience, highlighting a shared frustration with the perceived dullness of the proceedings.

As the public comment period continued, Curtis Ray, a newcomer to the political scene, announced his candidacy for county commissioner. He lamented the current state of governance, suggesting that it was disheartening to require legal advice to uphold First Amendment rights regarding public comment. His candidacy signals a growing desire among residents for change and a more responsive local government.

The meeting concluded with a palpable sense of urgency for reform and greater transparency. As residents voiced their concerns, it became clear that the community is eager for a more participatory approach to governance, one that honors their right to speak and be heard. The discussions from this meeting not only reflect the immediate concerns of Washington County but also hint at a broader movement towards accountability and engagement in local politics.