The City of Miami's CEB Special Magistrate meeting on May 5, 2025, focused on a case involving a property cited for multiple code violations, including work performed without the necessary permits. The session began with procedural clarifications regarding the interpretation services for a non-English speaking participant, ensuring effective communication throughout the proceedings.
Inspector Hedgeworth from the City of Miami's Code Compliance North Office presented evidence regarding the property in question. He confirmed that a notice of violation had been issued to the previous owner and that the current owner was present at the hearing. The inspector detailed the nature of the violations, which included the installation of two front doors, replacement windows, and unpermitted fencing and driveway work.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The inspector noted that while some plans for remodeling had been submitted, no permits had been obtained for the cited violations. Photographic evidence was introduced to illustrate the unpermitted changes made to the property. The inspector emphasized that the property was originally intended as a single-family home, and the modifications made were not compliant with city codes.
During the hearing, the current owner argued that the property was in the same condition when he purchased it in February 2024, suggesting that he should not be held responsible for the prior owner's actions. However, the magistrate clarified that property ownership entails responsibility for all existing conditions, regardless of when they were established.
The city requested a timeline for compliance, proposing a 120-day period for the owner to obtain the necessary after-the-fact permits, with an additional 150 days for any further extensions if needed. The magistrate indicated that a finding of guilt would be issued for the violations, reinforcing the owner's obligation to rectify the issues.
In conclusion, the meeting underscored the importance of adhering to city codes and the responsibilities that come with property ownership. The magistrate's decision aims to ensure compliance and promote safety within the community, setting a clear path for the property owner to address the violations.