Oregon committee reviews SB 180 to enhance anti SLAPP law protections for survivors

May 05, 2025 | Legislative, Oregon

Thanks to Scribe from Workplace AI , all articles about Oregon are free for you to enjoy throughout 2025!


This article was created by AI using a video recording of the meeting. It summarizes the key points discussed, but for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Link to Full Meeting

The Oregon House Committee on Judiciary convened on May 5, 2025, to discuss significant legislative changes aimed at strengthening protections against strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPP). Central to the meeting was Senate Bill 180 (SB 180), which seeks to close existing gaps in Oregon's anti-SLAPP law, particularly concerning statements made by survivors of abuse.

Advocates for SB 180 highlighted that the current law only protects statements made to government bodies or those deemed to be of public interest in public spaces. The proposed amendment would expand these protections, allowing survivors to dismiss lawsuits that target them for speaking out. This change aligns Oregon with other states, such as California and New York, which have already enacted similar laws to shield survivors from abusive litigation.
final logo

Before you scroll further...

Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!

Subscribe for Free

During the meeting, committee members discussed the procedural aspects of the proposed law. If enacted, defendants would have the opportunity to file a motion to dismiss a lawsuit under the anti-SLAPP procedure shortly after being served. This motion would pause all proceedings, preventing any discovery or depositions from occurring while the court considers the case's merits.

The discussion also covered the burden of proof in these cases. Initially, the defendant must demonstrate that their statement qualifies for protection under the new law. If successful, the burden then shifts to the plaintiff to prove that the statement was made with malice or does not pertain to the protected categories.

Family Scribe
Custom Ad
The committee's deliberations underscored the importance of this legislation in providing a safer environment for survivors to share their experiences without the fear of retaliatory lawsuits. As the committee prepares to issue its report on SB 180, the outcome could significantly impact the legal landscape for survivors in Oregon.

Converted from House Committee On Judiciary 05/05/2025 3:00 PM meeting on May 05, 2025
Link to Full Meeting

Comments

    View full meeting

    This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

    View full meeting

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Oregon articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI