In a recent work session held on May 5, 2025, the Leesburg Board of Architectural Review (BAR) engaged in a spirited discussion about the architectural plans for new developments in the Crescent Design District. The meeting, which took place in the heart of Leesburg, highlighted the balance between preserving the town's historic charm and accommodating modern growth.
One of the key points raised was the impact of new townhomes on the views of residents living in the historic district along South King Street. Brian, a board member, noted that these new homes would be designed so that their front facades face the historic properties, minimizing the visual disruption of backyards and garages. This thoughtful approach aims to maintain the aesthetic integrity of the historic area while allowing for contemporary development.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The board reviewed several proposed buildings, including a purely commercial structure dubbed Building C, which was praised for its traditional design that aligns with the recently approved warehouse hotel. Building D, a residential project, also received positive feedback for its classic architectural features, including a defined base and traditional window designs. However, the exact number of residential units in Building D remained unclear, as some details were omitted from the presentation.
Concerns were raised about the height and mass of the new buildings, particularly their potential impact on the surrounding area. The maximum height allowed in the Crescent Design District is 70 feet, with the proposed buildings ranging from 60 to 65 feet. Some board members expressed apprehension that the scale of these developments might surprise local residents, given the current elevations in the area.
The discussion also touched on the procedural aspects of the review process. Since the developments are not located within an architectural control district, the BAR's ability to influence design elements was limited. This led to a broader conversation about the need for more comprehensive input from the board on such significant projects, as members felt that the lack of oversight could lead to community dissatisfaction.
As the meeting concluded, the board members acknowledged the importance of balancing development with the preservation of Leesburg's historical character. The ongoing dialogue reflects a community grappling with growth while striving to honor its rich heritage, leaving residents and board members alike eager to see how these developments will unfold in the coming months.