[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6065699,"mediaKeyId","3196653-ef1726a946bbed5a37f73bd03a2f3e08","parentId",3196653,"title","Votes at a glance: Sanford Commission approves first-reading ordinance changes, annexation, rezoning and multiple procurement and budget items","audioSeconds",1896,"startMs",1514000,"endMs",3410000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3196653-ef1726a946bbed5a37f73bd03a2f3e08&start=1514&end=3410","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3196653-ef1726a946bbed5a37f73bd03a2f3e08/thumbnail_1514000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6065699/Sanford/Seminole-County/Florida/Votes-at-a-glance-Sanford-Commission-approves-first-reading-ordinance-changes-annexation-rezoning-and-multiple-procurement-and-budget-items","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6065699-671f3054f4022c505640d9e83e203a55/orig.mp4?Expires=1771155794&Signature=J~jVLe8TNhEJ3PoNuQszAQCyuDuuHDAfN4RJaZINIQPCsiWNKVSyqOENvqNUi6bG9cYOr-UdiZwWJAhLblIwH9hWzXWDMZ4XcmBBQ0IE3NllYNejv~AshOfBIxBnA6Vq3JjGyWmQCxm10Hn8YBtuHusFYCXewKRmKrjOiGG6Pp1CkXJyHO3OccsdbkhRGTl3mG9l2yKRZLo6W7F~wV5v1Kyg5foPr1wtWt86h4NBP1AjDt4hbtQImpq1FmYIO3HUtdBLM~fjEKwSkGCOBwZjAkh9VcGuAVECPj2VQHEqqElUWbnW-WCvCoCR0euoS-VKq3Yd6SUatQa8qtqsJP8JFg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Sanford, FL","date","2025-03-31T00:00:00Z","article","The Sanford City Commission on Monday approved multiple ordinance first readings, procurement actions and budget amendments. Several items were unanimous; other votes were uncontested or approved on first reading as noted.

Key outcomes

- Ordinance 48-20 (first reading) — Repeal and restructure of code provisions governing the Sanford Museum Board, converting it to an advisory body: Approved on first reading.

- Ordinance 48-21 (first reading) — Amendments to code enforcement hearing officer / special magistrate procedures: Approved on first reading.

- Ordinance 48-22 (first reading) — Voluntary annexation of 0.16 acres (parcel commonly addressed as 1609 Southwest Road): Approved on first reading.

- Ordinance 48-23 (first reading) — Comprehensive plan amendment to change future land use from Seminole County Commercial to City General Commercial for the same 0.16-acre parcel (1609 Southwest Road): Planning and Zoning recommended approval; commission approved on first reading.

- Ordinance 48-24 (first reading) — Rezoning of 0.168 acres at 1609 Southwest Road from Seminole County retail-commercial to City General Commercial (GC): Approved on first reading following quasi-judicial disclosures.

- Condor Construction — Contract award for Second Street improvement project in the amount of $2,393,484.60 with a retained contingency of $306,515.40; funding provided by the Community Redevelopment Agency: Contract found to be lowest responsive and responsible bid and awarded.

- Emergency and sole-source procurements — The commission approved several procurement items presented by staff, including emergency procurement for polymer and coagulant chemicals from CLMS, sole-source procurements for pumps, and procurement services for Northgate Limited for plant maintenance parts; specific amounts were outlined in staff reports and approved.

- Budget amendments and transfers — The commission approved multiple budget transfers and amendments including a package totaling approximately $7,579,000 that covered generator replacement, Grove View project increases, lift-station work, and other capital adjustments; other budget amendments included amounts tied to meter-exchange consulting ($90,000), hydrant replacement ($41,834), and utilities repair ($350,000).

- Resolution 33-64 — Approval to accept county conveyance of a parcel for use in a city stormwater management project: Approved.

- Resolution 33-65 — Deferred to a future meeting.

- Resolution 33-66, 33-67, 33-68, 33-69 — Budget and procurement-related amendments for utilities, meter deployment consulting, hydrant replacement and Fire Station 40 stormwater interlocal adjustments: Approved as presented.

- Memorandum of Agreement with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) — Commission approved entering into an MOU with ICE; staff and the police chief described the agreement as providing that one trained officer would be available to assist ICE/DHS when requested and that participating personnel functions would be carried out at the LEA's expense; the motion passed 3–1.

Several items were described by staff as \"housekeeping\" changes to align code with practice; the commission approved first readings and directed staff to return certain items for final action at second readings where required.

Votes and next steps

All items requiring second reading or additional filings (for example, ordinance codification or HPB filings connected to other agenda items) were noted by staff; where required the second reading and final action will return to a future meeting. Contracts and procurements will be processed consistent with city procurement rules and the terms presented in staff reports.

Ending

City staff will post formal ordinances and contract awards after required administrative steps are completed. Members of the public can consult the city clerk for packet materials and staff reports for line-item details.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Sanford City Commission Meeting March 31st, 2025 (Audio)","oneSentenceSummary","At its March 31 meeting the Sanford City Commission approved a slate of first-reading ordinances, annexation and rezoning for a 0.16-acre parcel at 1609 Southwest Road, awarded a public-works construction contract, and approved a series of procurements and budget amendments.","taxTitle","Sanford, Seminole County, Florida","taxId",5039,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6065704,"Sanford commission authorizes potential lawsuit over unpermitted work at 101 E. First St.; owner agrees to pause unpermitted construction",1140,4140000,5280000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3196653-ef1726a946bbed5a37f73bd03a2f3e08&start=4140&end=5280","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3196653-ef1726a946bbed5a37f73bd03a2f3e08/thumbnail_4140000.jpg","/articles/6065704/Sanford/Seminole-County/Florida/Sanford-commission-authorizes-potential-lawsuit-over-unpermitted-work-at-101-E-First-St-owner-agrees-to-pause-unpermitted-construction","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6065704-f1d8a2e1fd82f415a1d5c339e9f007af/orig.mp4?Expires=1771155794&Signature=hNkmLuJddj~DvHmujB6BD4mB73cC1bOuvOIn~B5xuck9dSS-7q3UJ4SNjjXpPgS54Djg5dXyIyyZODhUBO1XtLF5Rs-e6ll6L11G51oMuI2xD5CGTjqTRIRyQv2OIsQ9mO4aBtgxcpYBfOIkvbepUkmsJgr8H23fAWogKp7oUynH-ulaPtZLn1HFQJWfZSZEWT34WVu8zMDV7TtcuLCW0IZrSSeGF0gbOiL-rDKCaQiy9pMXsZzQ~0-d97MAQE2YjxhFW3h5Y9yG~7iXDWicwLdDCnZSA2C5km5Nc4ll5ngTLCXWz6PlsqHTgYpaJKVntlmTiHjSDjKn5igEah1T3A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Sanford City Commission voted Monday to authorize the city attorney to prepare litigation aimed at enforcing city codes at 101 East First Street, a redevelopment project that city staff say proceeded in part without required permits and certificates of appropriateness.

City Development Services staff summarized a multi-year permit review and enforcement history for the property, saying the owner had secured some approvals but had not completed the site-development process needed for exterior or vertical work. Development staff said the pump house on the property was demolished without a completed site-development permit and that subsequent inspections showed additional unpermitted activity.

City staff asked the commission for authority to seek injunctive relief and other remedies; the request included a carve-out that litigation would be filed only if the property owner resumed nonpermitted work. Commissioner motion language authorized filing the suit but allowed abatement while the owner pursued the historic-preservation and building approvals required by the city.

Developer Mohammed Rashad, the property owner at issue, addressed the commission and said he had applied for site development permits and a separate building permit for an elevator shaft and other vertical elements. Rashad said he had relied on a third-party plan reviewer and asserted portions of the work had been permitted for interior work; staff and the building division said the interior permit did not authorize exterior or vertical construction. Rashad told the commission he would stop nonpermitted work if allowed to proceed with the permitting process.

Commissioners and staff stressed several deadlines and procedural steps. City staff said one limiting factor was that prior certificates of appropriateness (C of A) had expired and that the next Historic Preservation Board (HPB) hearing is April 16; staff said a complete application for HPB consideration must be submitted by the HPB filing deadline (stated in the meeting as the day after the commission meeting) to enable review at the April 16 HPB meeting.

After discussion, the commission approved the authorization with the condition that litigation would be filed only upon noncompliance (defined as resumption of nonpermitted construction), and that permitted horizontal/site and utility work already authorized by the issued site-development permit could proceed. The commission directed staff to provide the owner with a written list of exactly which permits and approvals are required and to provide commissioners with that list.

Ending

The owner pledged to pause nonpermitted vertical construction; city staff said they would file suit if work continued outside approved permits and instructed the owner on the HPB and building-permit deadlines needed to restore compliance.","After months of permitting disputes and a stop-work order, the commission authorized staff to prepare litigation that would be filed only if the property owner resumes unpermitted work; commissioners conditioned the authorization on abatement while the owner pursues the required historic and building approvals.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6065709,"Sanford commissioners decline to approve March minutes after heated exchange over personnel language",650,690000,1340000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3196653-ef1726a946bbed5a37f73bd03a2f3e08&start=690&end=1340","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3196653-ef1726a946bbed5a37f73bd03a2f3e08/thumbnail_690000.jpg","/articles/6065709/Sanford/Seminole-County/Florida/Sanford-commissioners-decline-to-approve-March-minutes-after-heated-exchange-over-personnel-language","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6065709-5f4cb6cdee9ce00ef50a84aee3ea72d6/orig.mp4?Expires=1771155794&Signature=PPDFX75HWNNZyM1pSxHTuTJlaDe6dyTKF4TWsuygcIjclQc5gUqCy3CeiVw7la54exwaKyLb783ErYGoN4IsKVkgpp-Fbhumipx6pPtjwGxyp6fOo6nfaNBchiclCoVSEV2ZzGAhts9-5IVxddcRO7ccvN1mkUApg-V4VOtcFZEKIlB5hNYF63PuUTChhXTmFUL5X1q10Wmw~lk0AXsc9pSY3NU3zJ~lJAW8PLZYMK0avvrCmM4hle5kcHQyaxQu2FXWZ22gkmBVqCR91ouPYZeg8viZIQY9O4~QSp8LZca6oTmbfeN-vxum9DILajKx6aKJcVcXbjqhF0i8op0Ccw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Mayor Art Woodruff convened the Sanford City Commission Monday and a motion to approve the minutes of the March 10, 2025 meeting failed after members disagreed over language describing a commissioner-issued reprimand.

The dispute centered on whether a sentence in the draft minutes implied an individual commissioner had issued a reprimand to a staff member. Commissioner Bridal argued the minutes as written mischaracterized events and accused the city manager of creating a “spirit of retaliation.” \"There is a spirit of retaliation. There's a spirit of fear when there's supposed to be an open door policy,\" Commissioner Bridal said during the discussion.

Deputy City Attorney Tracy told the commission that individual commissioners lack authority to discipline employees and that the charter sets a different process. \"The commission may make investigations into the affairs of the city and the conduct of any city department, office, or agency,\" Tracy said, citing the commission's investigative authority under the charter and arguing discipline should be handled under established procedures.

Commissioners debated whether the minutes' language constituted an adjudication of personnel matters and whether placing such wording in the public record was appropriate. After discussion, a motion to approve the minutes as written did not carry; the clerk will return the item to a future agenda for further consideration.

The exchanges were part of a broader set of remarks and public comments at the meeting in which residents and commissioners raised concerns about city leadership, human-resources practices and staff accountability. Business owner Christina Hollerbach addressed the commission at public comment, saying the city’s culture favors \"reactionary decision making\" over long-term solutions. Other residents echoed concerns about transparency and staff conduct.

The commission did not take disciplinary action at the meeting; commissioners and staff reiterated that formal personnel actions are managed through human resources and, where appropriate, the city manager. The deputy city attorney recommended any formal investigation or discipline proceed under the charter's investigatory provisions rather than as an adjudication in the minutes.

The minutes item will return to a future meeting after staff and the clerk review proposed revisions.

Ending

No formal personnel discipline or charter-level action was taken at the meeting; the commission deferred approval of the contested minutes pending revised language and additional legal clarification.","The Sanford City Commission did not approve minutes from its March 10 meeting after commissioners disputed wording that described a reprimand and debated the commission's role in personnel matters.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Sanford Commission approves first-reading ordinance changes, annexation, rezoning and multiple procurement and budget items

Sanford commission authorizes potential lawsuit over unpermitted work at 101 E. First St.; owner agrees to pause unpermitted construction

Sanford commissioners decline to approve March minutes after heated exchange over personnel language