The Columbus County Board of Commissioners convened on May 5, 2025, to discuss significant changes to the municipal tax collection system, addressing long-standing concerns about the financial viability of the current model. The meeting highlighted the need for a new rate structure to ensure the county can adequately cover its costs while providing tax collection services to local municipalities.
Eddie Mann, the planning manager, presented the challenges faced by the county's tax office, noting that the existing rate of $3 per account has not been updated in decades. This outdated rate has resulted in financial losses, as the county often spends more on postage and materials than it collects. Mann emphasized that the county has been absorbing costs associated with discounts offered by some municipalities, complicating the financial landscape further.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The board discussed various proposals for a new rate, with Mann recommending a rate of 2.5% based on taxes collected, including delinquent accounts. This approach, he argued, would generate approximately $136,000 in revenue, contingent on all municipalities contracting with the county for tax collection services. However, some municipalities have expressed interest in exploring alternative arrangements.
During the meeting, Commissioner Byrd proposed a motion to set the rate at 3%, aligning with neighboring counties like Bladen and Robeson, which charge similar rates. The motion sparked a debate among commissioners, with some supporting Byrd's proposal while others favored Mann's recommendation of 2.5%. Ultimately, the board voted in favor of the 3% rate, reflecting a consensus that the county must ensure its financial sustainability while continuing to provide essential services.
The decision marks a pivotal moment for Columbus County as it seeks to modernize its tax collection practices and address the financial challenges that have persisted for years. The board plans to revisit the agreements with municipalities periodically to ensure the new rate structure remains effective and mutually beneficial.