Alonco Health seeks zoning variances for fencing and parking in Indianapolis development

The City Council of Indianapolis convened on May 6, 2025, for a meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals, Division 1, where significant discussions centered around variance requests from Alonco Health regarding their new headquarters on the West Side of Indianapolis.

The meeting commenced with a presentation by Tyler Oakes, representing Alonco Health, who outlined two variance requests. The first request sought approval for a reduction in parking space dimensions for a newly constructed parking garage, which was supported by city staff. The garage features spaces measuring 8.5 feet by 18 feet, slightly below the required minimum of 9 feet by 18 feet. The board unanimously approved this request.

The more contentious issue arose from Alonco's request for an 8-foot tall decorative perimeter fence, which exceeds the 3.5-foot height limit set by the city’s zoning ordinance. Oakes argued that the fence was necessary for the safety and security of employees, particularly given the industrial nature of the surrounding area and previous crime reports indicating safety concerns. He emphasized that the fence would provide peace of mind for employees working late hours.

City staff, however, recommended denial of the fence variance, citing that an 8-foot fence would set a poor precedent in the regional center and Central Business District, which are intended to foster a pedestrian-friendly environment. Staff suggested that a 5-foot fence would be a more appropriate compromise, noting that such a height is more common in the area.

During the discussion, board members expressed varying opinions on the fence height. Some acknowledged the potential intimidation factor of an 8-foot fence but also recognized the unique context of Alonco's location. Ultimately, the board voted separately on the two variance requests. The parking space variance was approved unanimously, while the fence variance was granted with a split vote—four members in favor and one against.

The meeting concluded with a brief recess before moving on to the next case on the agenda, indicating a structured and methodical approach to the zoning appeals process in Indianapolis. The outcome of these discussions reflects ongoing efforts to balance safety concerns with community aesthetics and zoning regulations.