Assembly supports AB 632 to improve cannabis regulations in California

The Assembly Judiciary Committee of the California State Assembly convened on May 6, 2025, to discuss several key legislative measures, including Assembly Bill 632 (AB 632) and Assembly Constitutional Amendment 7 (ACA 7).

The meeting began with a focus on AB 632, which garnered support from various stakeholders, including representatives from the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors and the League of California Cities. Jean Hurst, speaking on behalf of the Santa Clara County Board, expressed strong support for the measure, highlighting its importance in regulating the cannabis industry. Assemblymember Papan also voiced his intention to co-author the bill, emphasizing the need to ensure compliance among cannabis operators and create a level playing field for those adhering to regulations.

Following a brief discussion, the committee moved to a vote on AB 632, which passed as amended with unanimous support from the members present.

The agenda then shifted to ACA 7, presented by Assemblymember Jackson. This amendment aims to clarify Section 31a of the California Constitution, addressing concerns regarding its misuse and ensuring alignment with the original intent of voters from 1996. Jackson requested an aye vote, framing the amendment as a priority for the Black Caucus. Support for ACA 7 was also voiced by Brian Rivas from Education Trust West, although no opposition was noted during the discussion.

The meeting concluded with a clear progression through the agenda items, reflecting a collaborative effort among committee members to advance legislative priorities. The successful passage of AB 632 and the support for ACA 7 indicate a focused approach to addressing regulatory challenges and constitutional clarity in California.