[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6559198,"mediaKeyId","3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420","parentId",3217794,"title","Mayor proposes ending curbside recycling in budget; council debates costs, messaging and self‑hauling analysis","audioSeconds",393,"startMs",77384,"endMs",470625,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420&start=77&end=470","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420/thumbnail_77384.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6559198/Riverton/Salt-Lake-County/Utah/Mayor-proposes-ending-curbside-recycling-in-budget-council-debates-costs-messaging-and-selfhauling-analysis","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6559198-70833dd4663b39110172586ebf891625/orig.mp4?Expires=1770442608&Signature=PRAA~lPh2httZsGQRRPIXiF4JepX1z5wlsM1dS~i2HCl~DwzrkHX32XimqwbryaN-4fJ2ugU0xFBYsltYRgWRc8RHGGj3x-9hj~09tUAD2HnGalUCRe3oHoCiUXL-GOOvm1kmOCY1~x5Hxhyu9FGp9NdDTI5odHwhX6lU371ZAhs-QUOBw2uykJKiZg~qFfB8-XoojOvKtVQLb1XJm~6lITNdbidWQ8xN-ETOoOPdaDU3NmMb16X-tQw9UBc2DvXECyCGIMnvpy5ufE8Z5~3rZjsyp4cKbaER~RUo9ULf5Jk0~9vXwkg2G0xIYdKNwntlkOUmPic6m5NZyfD6nx2iQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Riverton","date","2025-05-06T00:00:00Z","article","The mayor proposed eliminating curbside recycling in the coming budget and asked the council to consider using regional collection points for aluminum, paper and cardboard instead.

That proposal is part of the draft budget the mayor presented to the Riverton City Council during its May work session; staff told the council state law and the city’s contract with Waste Management require six months’ notice to discontinue curbside recycling. The mayor said household recycling represents roughly 8% of annual collected weight and that contamination cuts the amount actually recycled to about 6–7% of total pickup.

The discussion matters because recycling is currently subsidized from the general fund and the city is weighing whether to raise sanitation fees, continue curbside service, or end curbside recycling and direct limited resources to regional drop‑off sites. Mayor: \"That's why I'm proposing the elimination of curbside recycling in this budget. We have to give us 6 months.\" Kevin, a city operations staff member who presented analysis, said diversion averaged 8% in calendar 2024 and contamination averaged about 19% in recent audits; for the first two months of 2025 diversion rose to about 10%.

Council members split on next steps. Councilmember McKay said she toured the local material recovery facility and supports keeping recycling — at least under an opt‑in model to reduce contamination — arguing many residents want to keep curbside recycling: \"We had 72% of residents that said that they wanted to keep the recycling.\" Councilmember McDougall and others said recycling of much of the plastic stream is no longer economically viable and that collection and processing emissions plus contamination reduce the environmental benefits. McDougall said: \"I think the carbon emissions that we are creating…collecting a second run on trash…is creating more pollution than we're saving in recycling.\" Several council members emphasized that any decision will need a robust communications campaign to explain the change to residents.

Staff described alternatives discussed in the draft budget: maintain curbside recycling but raise the per‑household fee, end curbside recycling and provide regional collection containers at parks and city facilities (the mayor's budget included a partial allocation for that), or keep curbside but institute an opt‑in/opt‑out model at the end of the current Waste Management contract in June 2028. Staff also prepared a self‑hauling (in‑house hauling) analysis, which includes roughly $5.5 million in startup costs for vehicles and facility improvements; staff said that approach could buy the city a few years before fees would need to rise again but would require debt to finance vehicles and infrastructure.

Councilmembers asked for more detail before a final decision. Several asked staff to return with a communications plan, more precise net cost savings (including tipping fees and processing fees), and scenarios showing fee changes and resident impacts if curbside recycling is removed. Staff noted the contract’s processing‑fee cap would allow monthly recycling charges to reach a worst‑case $4.47 per can, but current processing fees were lower.

City staff said that if the council directs elimination of curbside recycling, six months’ notice would provide time to execute public outreach and to bid any regional recycling contract.

Council members did not take a formal vote on the proposal during the work session; they asked staff for additional financial scenarios and a public education plan before final budget deliberations.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Riverton - City Council Meeting - May 06, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The mayor proposed eliminating curbside recycling in the coming budget and asked the council to consider using regional collection points for aluminum, paper and cardboard instead.","taxTitle","Riverton , Salt Lake County, Utah","taxId",7396,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6559188,"Council continues DAI storage‑facility rezoning and development‑agreement to May 20 after public traffic and land‑use concerns",1532,8834135,10367100,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420&start=8834&end=10367","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420/thumbnail_8834135.jpg","/articles/6559188/Riverton/Salt-Lake-County/Utah/Council-continues-DAI-storagefacility-rezoning-and-developmentagreement-to-May-20-after-public-traffic-and-landuse-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6559188-b5c294f51694d32d55451aa49585bacb/orig.mp4?Expires=1770442608&Signature=XkLwkVov6TqSkGaZRQR1KpKKMBXZfeINwaswejveZAfUpmRTJv3luZioRU4GZtlNfDlmoW2BBxOHQH6mjmKgPdf0fNHBtvxeTyX3ixK1IAxljEf8s-JD-zA52RcUm4f90Y0RPxISrvUuWhOr3OnEKyPt1H4o7yR7qL6fdek~qpL2XV4n7ymHbReOpYNfARfYk6qBizQUuONijvmxedI2s2JuThpQx8dl85UxNXG2j8M23X8Dotk47DXg1k~MX8W-osCGre2qPn383Nv6jQ-LkrQlLaS-kMsZOdonYonpDHyjwb5YpTmvJe6D1gkIq55FJ6zDsSotdDmFlqDWvLiPzw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Riverton City Council continued action on a proposed development agreement and rezone that would allow a self‑storage facility with accessory outdoor vehicle storage on a previously platted, undeveloped subdivision near 126 South and 4000 West.

Applicant Joe Salisbury (DAI) and city planning staff presented a plan that would vacate an unused interior subdivision road, preserve two existing residences on site, and build storage buildings in phases. The draft development agreement restricts permitted uses to self‑storage with associated outdoor vehicle storage and sets building heights and design standards; the applicant requested three targeted deviations from typical code (reduced landscape buffer in one location because of mature trees on adjacent property, a reduced building setback for two buildings from 40 to 36 feet where adjacent property owners provided written support, and a signage alternative that would allow a faux tower structure instead of a conventional pole sign).

Several residents spoke during the public hearing and expressed concerns about traffic on 4000 West (used as a shortcut), peak‑period turning difficulty at the site driveway, and long‑term land‑use consequences if a temporary zoning change expired. One resident asked the council to consider the cumulative traffic effect and suggested that a larger transportation review could be warranted: \"If we think 4000 West is going to handle more commercial traffic...we're gonna have to rebuild that whole road to be able to handle more traffic.\"

Councilmember McDougall, who moved to continue the item, said he supports the project concept but requested clearer contract language before the council acts. McDougall specifically asked staff and the applicant to add explicit language that clarifies what happens when the 15‑year term in the development agreement expires (whether the use remains allowed or reverts to other uses), to document drainage and infrastructure responsibilities (including an underground detention solution described by staff), and to ensure the development agreement matches the site plan and conditions recommended by planning staff. The council voted to continue consideration of ordinance 25‑15 to the May 20 meeting to allow the city attorney and the applicant to finalize the agreement language.

Action: Councilmember McDougall moved to continue ordinance 25‑15 (the rezone/development agreement) to the May 20 meeting so staff and the applicant can finalize terms; Councilmember Barroker seconded. The motion passed on a voice/roll‑call without recorded opposition.

Next steps: Staff and the applicant will return with finalized development‑agreement language clarifying post‑term permitted uses, infrastructure/drainage commitments, and the final site plan and sign details for planning‑commission/council review on May 20.","The council continued action on a proposed DAI development agreement and rezone to allow a phased self‑storage facility with accessory outdoor vehicle storage, directing staff and the applicant to clarify post‑term use rights, drainage and infrastructure language before the May 20 meeting.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6559193,"Council adopts ordinance allowing short‑term commercial use on vacant residential lots along major roads; 60‑day permits, staff review required",1720,6883385,8604300,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420&start=6883&end=8604","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420/thumbnail_6883385.jpg","/articles/6559193/Riverton/Salt-Lake-County/Utah/Council-adopts-ordinance-allowing-shortterm-commercial-use-on-vacant-residential-lots-along-major-roads-60day-permits-staff-review-required","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6559193-185434a1dbd35b248ddbbfdf5a32b358/orig.mp4?Expires=1770442608&Signature=Q~0OEOm67lFUDKnxPwCLgF9SDIVNRPfpanXIDXgr8ggYettovhO8KN7ogCE0n4zP4w~Urb5mGRohaGIzlQFfhb6oT3crwMZOALTCeXXsMeL1wPbF8QzYva8kiaQj119GSxsP1bCDLt8lz6KUg9kJEFvCE5rj8uyhib5J~9YggVA-~q3eX7cB32BhHZd1F7z7gnn~gu1cItxAr0701zRjKSNT4KkS-XBMRwWB8UzO26y0K6VQoqY1T5sUalZ~AOyWF6U3nXr5qa3KVDt69J9wuOA-mZRz5piJ~7yjI6nlY2PCOWigirq-6we~oOFwxkCGLzZ6OBFeQhtI1q2bowPbEA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Riverton City Council members voted to allow temporary commercial uses on vacant residential lots that have direct access to major roadways, subject to permit conditions intended to limit noise, lighting, parking and public‑safety impacts.

The ordinance change — which passed after substitute motion 4–1 — authorizes temporary, short‑term commercial operations (examples discussed included seasonal Christmas tree sales, fireworks stands and similar activities) only on undeveloped residential parcels with direct access to a roadway designated as a major road in city code. The council adopted a 60‑day limit for each permit; future uses on the same parcel would require a new permit. Staff will review permit applications for parking, emergency access, lighting (the ordinance references existing temporary‑commercial lighting standards that prohibit flashing lights within 100 feet of residences) and compliance with fire code permitting for hazardous items such as fireworks.

Councilmember Perucci, who moved the substitute motion to approve, said the text balances property rights and neighborhood impacts and that the permit will be time‑limited and revocable if violations occur. He told the council the ordinance is tailored to keep heavy activity on major arterials and away from side streets: \"The draft…would say access for a temporary commercial use would need to come off the major roadway. It couldn't use any side street.\"

Unified Fire Authority staff confirmed fireworks and other hazardous displays will still require fire permits and inspections under the International Fire Code. The Riverton police and code‑enforcement teams will enforce parking and nuisance issues; staff said permits can be revoked if a property is in current code violation. Councilmember Broker voted against the ordinance, citing neighborhood‑specific code‑compliance concerns in areas where applicants have prior code problems; Broker said additional work is needed to ensure the city can enforce conditions in those locations.

Vote: The roll‑call vote on the substitute motion to approve the ordinance was McDougall — yes; McKay — yes; Hammond — yes; Perucci — yes; Broker — no. The Council therefore adopted the ordinance change by a 4–1 vote.

What changes: key permit limits and standards adopted in the ordinance include:
- Scope: only vacant, undeveloped residential parcels with direct access to a major roadway are eligible.
- Duration: each permit is valid for a single 60‑day period; future uses require a new permit.
- Review criteria: emergency vehicle access, on‑site parking (permittees must provide on‑site parking), lighting controls (no flashing or distracting lights toward residences), noise and dust mitigation, and fire permits for hazardous products (e.g., fireworks). Staff may refer a particular application to the planning commission in unique cases.

Next steps: Staff will implement the permit form and process and coordinate with Unified Fire Authority and code enforcement. Councilmembers urged staff to ensure neighbors get notice and to prepare clear permit standards and a checklist for applicants.","Riverton City Council members voted 4–1 to permit temporary commercial uses on vacant, undeveloped residential lots that have direct access to major roadways, with each permit limited to a single 60‑day period and subject to staff review for parking, lighting, noise and fire safety.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6559183,"Council approves park perimeter resolution and tentatively adopts FY26 budget; consent agenda approved",6557,4388935,10946510,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420&start=4388&end=10946","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3217794-25e1b0da775e3bc3ba5233626eaaa420/thumbnail_4388935.jpg","/articles/6559183/Riverton/Salt-Lake-County/Utah/Council-approves-park-perimeter-resolution-and-tentatively-adopts-FY26-budget-consent-agenda-approved","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6559183-d7bee63194dcd36ada0ee2424ccaa8d8/orig.mp4?Expires=1770442608&Signature=O3dKdu58TLEJNw-JDILCL5smv~FHJoE-5~SffXjxVdjERpmuOD8wfrPXBbZhAveCneQgw6rj7yotzaifDvaoZpSnebrxM7wO-WRMQU9ZWPG32Dt5bOeMMNDJ09~ZiNCP99iSZwTwwJJ~HatnfSASBfmhENWl4SOjwG3MGi9S6k3TJs0bEo7-55vFli6K3WPDXsZmf0Byk9tjgC3EPC-YzbpE7S2S6MCKINQsA93b5UNg4JA-4Fvi7wU8HuOtW6V9KpDPpmUl5Pre~HZIhvNLfOvTZ9wMiE3mgeBFeuBeSN-mqqPFSBis6wPerwYBUjOpoiNe1RJkMHNbDhSNrXuAYg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Riverton City Council approved a resolution establishing a formal recorded perimeter boundary for Riverton Main Park and then took the annual step of tentatively adopting the city’s FY26 budget for further review.

Resolution: The council voted to approve Resolution No. 25‑28 establishing the official perimeter boundary for Riverton Main Park to clarify property lines and proximity for future redevelopment or improvements. Councilmember McDougall moved the resolution; Councilmember Hammond seconded. The motion carried on a roll call vote.

Budget: The council also tentatively adopted the FY26 proposed budget, a necessary procedural step that allows staff to continue working on detailed line‑item adjustments and hold public hearings before final adoption. Councilmember McDougall moved to adopt the tentative budget; the motion passed. Councilmembers agreed to additional budget review meetings, and staff invited councilmembers to meet in small groups to walk through proposed changes. The mayor noted the proposed budget does not recommend fee increases for sanitation, water or secondary water in the draft presented but that the sanitation recycling discussion would continue.

Consent agenda: The council approved the consent agenda without removal items after a brief call for deletions; council moved and seconded the motion and approved by voice vote.

Continued items: The council also continued several items for later meetings, including an ordinance amending commercial architectural standards (continued to May 20) and the DAI development agreement (continued to May 20).","At the May council meeting the body approved a resolution establishing the formal perimeter boundary for Riverton Main Park and adopted a tentative fiscal‑year budget for FY26 for continued review. The consent agenda was approved; several items including an architectural standards ordinance were continued for later meetings.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Mayor proposes ending curbside recycling in budget; council debates costs, messaging and self‑hauling analysis

Council continues DAI storage‑facility rezoning and development‑agreement to May 20 after public traffic and land‑use concerns

Council adopts ordinance allowing short‑term commercial use on vacant residential lots along major roads; 60‑day permits, staff review required

Council approves park perimeter resolution and tentatively adopts FY26 budget; consent agenda approved