The Oregon State Legislature convened on May 7, 2025, to discuss a pivotal bill concerning tolling on the I-5 bridge, a topic that has sparked significant debate among lawmakers. The meeting highlighted the implications of tolling for both Oregon and Washington residents, with a focus on how the proposed legislation could affect funding and maintenance of the bridge.
A key point raised during the discussions was the inevitability of tolling on the bridge, regardless of the bill's outcome. Legislators emphasized that a unanimous vote against the bill would not halt tolling; instead, it would limit Oregon's ability to benefit from the toll revenues. Representative McLean pointed out that 70% of the traffic on the bridge comes from Washington residents, who would effectively contribute to the maintenance costs through tolls. This financial dynamic was underscored as a significant advantage for Oregon, as it would allow the state to utilize these funds for ongoing maintenance rather than relying solely on the general fund.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Concerns were voiced regarding the removal of specific language from Oregon law that mandates toll revenues be reduced. Some representatives expressed apprehension that this change could lead to less accountability in toll management, potentially impacting future funding for bridge maintenance. Representative Bossard articulated this concern, stating that the removal of the phrase "shall be reduced" from the law could lead to uncertainty about toll revenue management.
Despite the apprehensions, supporters of the bill argued that it is essential for Oregon to secure its share of toll revenues to ensure proper funding for the bridge's upkeep. They emphasized the importance of maintaining a collaborative relationship with Washington state and ensuring that Oregon's interests are protected in the ongoing discussions about the bridge's future.
As the meeting concluded, the legislators acknowledged the complexity of the issue and the need for continued dialogue. The bill represents a critical step in addressing the funding and maintenance of the I-5 bridge, with implications that extend beyond immediate financial concerns to broader transportation and infrastructure planning in the region. The outcome of this legislative discussion will shape how Oregon navigates its transportation funding strategies in the years to come.