[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6247888,"mediaKeyId","3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8","parentId",3212498,"title","District staff brief board on school improvement (land trust/TSSA) plans and new review app; board asked to review before June approval","audioSeconds",795,"startMs",4627000,"endMs",5422000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8&start=4627&end=5422","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8/thumbnail_4627000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6247888/Utah/District-staff-brief-board-on-school-improvement-land-trustTSSA-plans-and-new-review-app-board-asked-to-review-before-June-approval","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6247888-0763dc9781e0742e7a0d7f3ae8654ca1/orig.mp4?Expires=1774993106&Signature=g6bq4grTdYdnX007Q~14TW99GI4oAwkj8kHVwHhSTQ1fjWs5ZVp0JhM2xNGNtKNtVEdzpWzfHRIypinsqzn9VL5WOTsFKhCR~oIkGWxlhJ5ythwwNcsBbb~CuFnn4P9ZiYacB4tbJs1YJ37G3cVG9Q4S0OVVqCKfW2MYMgbDKPL0pkrQKJxTSQP6~xOjCGmcigPlqQmqwdIa06TP7ltp7lZ8sooB-oidKe0Nhc-P3XcqeiUcKBL8bImDLiopAdCCElmiQ5DSVRye7n9vG9pZB23VqE0hWEYs-T6psoybIpBQ0~UGiztINae3rXBbtQKUUre-of0qLAqEo~MclulMPA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-05-07T16:12:54.483Z","article","District staff gave the board an overview of school improvement plans (land trust and TSSA) and demonstrated a new plan‑review application designed to help board members read plans and add private notes.

Greg Wilkie, who led the presentation, told members state board rule requires the local board to ensure school plans include academic goals, action steps tied to those goals and academic measures for evaluating growth. He said the district staff had reviewed all plans and distributed them among board members for individual review; the intention is to finalize approval at the first June meeting following board review.

Why it matters: Land trust and TSSA plans direct school improvement spending and academic goals for each school. The board’s review is the required local oversight step under state board rule.

Administrators demonstrated the application and explained features: navigation by plan section, a one‑page scroll option, private note fields for board members and links to the state reporting template. John Hyatt, a district staff member, was introduced as the technical lead for the app and offered support for board members who need help accessing or navigating the tool.

Board process: Administrators asked board members to review goals, action steps and budgets within the plan app and to contact staff with questions before the June approval meeting. Staff emphasized they are available to help and will schedule follow‑up if specific plans require further discussion.

Ending: Board members thanked staff for the app and for dividing plans for review; staff reiterated they would be available for technical help and to answer content questions before the June vote.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Davis School District Board of Education Business Meeting, Tuesday, May 6, 2025.","oneSentenceSummary","Administrators presented the school improvement (land trust/TSSA) plans, explained board review responsibilities under state rules and introduced a new web app for plan review. Board members were asked to review assigned plans and provide questions before final approval in June.","taxTitle","Davis County School District, School Boards, Utah","taxId",65831,"location","Utah","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6247894,"Board approves districtwide hands‑on math intervention after public questions about future state standards",5785,1297000,7082000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8&start=1297&end=7082","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8/thumbnail_1297000.jpg","/articles/6247894/Utah/Board-approves-districtwide-handson-math-intervention-after-public-questions-about-future-state-standards","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6247894-59009beb12a1139f80b1624f96ffd1e4/orig.mp4?Expires=1774993106&Signature=VXbDoeywy4VYhlY3fU04kAtaEvdx~nckUN55j2ph271apAfnWINduVS1llw3kMbjTCsHwbTFPfFgVlDg~6zNZVow67amr7VqU~L1FEVX2hT8BmBgnNB72395ekIaf0oTMHqi7nF06yFDWBWAWYKRaW3O6BBNT4NDQ6nEeObiO0VSA49uAm~uFKpZt95PHQgA8Xn4yu6Jz-y2jsMu-2XyKWBWJXRyJ2joTz8jPrnArxXVEippOJ5CnRDJsIVY3Fwns7nU-PrlMW6uQ3gjltdS-aj~OXsO11rdmxenRiCImi6tBqa0O~eijAsaQwHa-bjnbZPPVs7fEqbA8CntFVkXuA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Davis School District Board approved a supplemental, hands‑on math intervention intended for Tier 2 and Tier 3 instruction in elementary schools.

District curriculum staff explained the material is not a new core curriculum but a scripted, manipulatives‑based supplemental program intended to address early numeracy and concept gaps. TJ Strain, who presented the item, said the program appealed to the committee because “it wasn't computer based... it was hands on... it was user friendly” and that it is intended to be used in short, scripted lessons during intervention time. He told the board one kit per school costs $2,500 and \"we'll be able to outfit the entire district for about $160,000.\" The district said math coaches will train paraprofessionals and tutors to use the materials.

Why it matters: The board's approval puts a consistent set of Tier 2/3 intervention materials in place across elementary schools. Administrators said a single, districtwide supplemental will make it easier to train staff and monitor implementation than a patchwork of products.

Public comment and compliance question: Public commenter Melanie Mortensen raised a compliance concern during public comment, saying, “they are changing the math curriculum which could come out as early as next year and the supplemental program that you are considering, tonight would be out of compliance.” District officials responded that because the material is supplemental — not a primary adoption — it would not be the district’s core curriculum. Board Member Marsha (surname on transcript) said she contacted the state school board member, who in turn consulted the state math and STEM curriculum specialist; the specialist “confirmed that she doesn't, there are not any concerns with this material that's being adopted,” according to the board member’s remarks.

Formal action: The board approved the instructional materials adoption by motion (mover: Ms. Hogan; seconder: Ms. Barber). The item had been pulled from consent for discussion and was approved as a single instructional‑materials item.

Implementation: District presenters said they will distribute two volumes per elementary school, train math paraprofessionals and math tutors, and use the materials for short (about 25–30 minute) intervention lessons. Administrators emphasized the program is concept‑based rather than grade‑based so that students with gaps can receive instruction at the concept level rather than strictly by grade.

Ending: Board members praised the manipulatives‑based approach and district training supports; staff said they will monitor usage and provide additional kits if schools request them.","The board approved a hands‑on, scripted supplemental math intervention for Tier 2/3 use in elementary schools. A public commenter warned the program could be out of compliance if state math standards change; the district said the material is supplemental and a state curriculum specialist raised no concerns.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6247897,"Board approves first‑through‑third grade boundary shift from Eagle Bay to Canyon Creek; concludes broader Antelope Drive study",448,6175000,6623000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8&start=6175&end=6623","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8/thumbnail_6175000.jpg","/articles/6247897/Utah/Board-approves-firstthroughthird-grade-boundary-shift-from-Eagle-Bay-to-Canyon-Creek-concludes-broader-Antelope-Drive-study","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6247897-4cf16cd9f6a5872163a61de67a262823/orig.mp4?Expires=1774993106&Signature=jtpT8PuEWu6tRSqgifU4OgZkfhJjtxbQ6WAsch1D~AxCHkuCwjgIgMldPZNTYDPQpkLp1-aHl9ytytJnZdZiEOBfsGe06Pc9omn8CZ9y48XyQktQEBs3Qb~eYkXu4vKOKV7picoj8oGVyqx9TjiFeli2a3rmJhRiOttKkTMrdWPsmyCNvU3djtCsuQMH9hkELZFi26oGxB~K1e0z4RzKm57ITR0mr~LV2ms1uhjl8l-W-Dkcl3fp5BLDcyohG3AL9GT7qaK87ccPKoG-DA6FGm-bGetPlRMr0jlEnUZ4dnFj2iyUV0j2ui5IWE4weasAvRPTeudpipWM7Scf~V6ang__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Davis School District Board of Education approved a targeted boundary change and concluded a broader, multi‑school study.

The board voted on a first and final reading to realign first‑, second‑ and third‑grade students who live in the current Eagle Bay Elementary boundaries and who are not enrolled in the district’s dual‑language immersion program to attend Canyon Creek Elementary School beginning in the 2025–26 school year. District staff said the change applies to students who reside in the affected boundary but are not in the dual‑language track.

Why it matters: The move affects elementary assignment, sibling‑placement considerations and seat availability; district staff said families may still request boundary variances under the existing process and that sibling priority is given within the variance procedure but is not an automatic transfer.

The board also voted to conclude a broader comprehensive boundary study that had examined schools south of Antelope Drive. Administration recommended ending that broad study without implementing changes and instead moving forward with localized, targeted studies guided by a rubric the staff will present to the board in a forthcoming workshop. District leaders said the initial comprehensive study provided helpful enrollment trends but was too broad to generate specific, actionable boundary recommendations.

Formal actions: The Eagle Bay/Canyon Creek boundary realignment was approved on a motion by Ms. Barber with a second by Ms. Mercer; the vote was recorded as all in favor. The motion to conclude the long‑term boundary study for the area south of Antelope Drive was moved by Ms. Hogan, seconded by Ms. Stevens and approved by the board on first and final reading.

District clarification: Staff said sibling priority is handled through the district’s boundary‑variance process and is not an automatic reassignment; school capacity will be monitored before any variance approvals.

Next steps: Administrators will present a rubric and a plan for more focused boundary reviews in coming months and will continue to engage principals and community groups as specific proposals are developed.

Ending: Board members thanked staff for their work and asked for continued communication with families about potential localized studies and any future boundary proposals.","On first and final reading the board approved moving non‑dual‑language first–third graders from Eagle Bay Elementary to Canyon Creek Elementary for the 2025–26 school year, and voted to end a wide-ranging South of Antelope Drive boundary study in favor of targeted future reviews and a rubric.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6247902,"Davis School Board ratifies teacher and support‑staff contracts amid state law uncertainty",298,5774000,6072000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8&start=5774&end=6072","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3212498-248ef4cde01c1984b9d34500105cc3f8/thumbnail_5774000.jpg","/articles/6247902/Utah/Davis-School-Board-ratifies-teacher-and-supportstaff-contracts-amid-state-law-uncertainty","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6247902-936ca090085723cf29d7723f705275ee/orig.mp4?Expires=1774993106&Signature=JtvhkZ5XhfSmazHVrLUxVqyYVhBhEZgq395I9Cskn6kSuo~DIE21wZw5BPsY476tXV-HfDW2cwzTsQran0PCkZqDbPKA2HA4YTESepRxHd9N2RQ0Ck3VDGvM9W9fA7gk33UlwcirCPBjA0xNV5mknflZO2fY9PN2G8-jpX3vtn6VyrtYwATHF6MjOSKZBUwGSuu7mK7jHhfPFhQaoBhnT35WVTN03XHtLI6Y~3nCmWrBg067fx5I9qz6qfw2PvUj5d0FTJcuChm0rGc61QHGncfAVlsqFFCDclR7~orlphvFIEMZcYEj2GCcF9Z6CsoiwOxMSqdZ5wUqwZZNtDQJgA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Davis School District Board of Education voted to ratify two negotiated agreements Wednesday: the district’s contract with the Davis Education Association and the agreement with the Davis Education Support Professionals.

The ratifications came after administrators told the board the pacts were negotiated and ratified by members of the two bargaining units, but their implementation could be affected by pending state action on HB 267. Assistant Superintendent Dr. Logan Toon told the board that “our intent is to have teacher voice play a significant role in our decision making process at the school district,” and framed the district’s approach as contingent on state rulings.

Why it matters: The agreements set compensation, working conditions and other terms for hundreds of teachers and classified support staff in the district. Board approval finalizes the district’s position but, administrators said, state-level changes could require adjustments or halt implementation.

The board heard brief public comments in support of the agreements. Denise Wilmore, president of the Davis Education Association, told the board the union’s members “ratified our contract our our agreement with a favorable recommendation.” Allen Miller, president of the Davis Educational Support Professionals, thanked the board and district for their collaboration during negotiations.

District officials described the legal uncertainty around HB 267 in detail. Dr. Toon said HB 267, enacted this year, “put a restriction on what public entities can do in terms of negotiations with employee groups.” He added that the lieutenant governor had issued a stay affecting the law and that the district would comply with state requirements if the law is enforced later.

Formal actions: The board approved the teacher negotiated agreement by motion (mover: Ms. Stevens; seconder: Ms. Barber) and approved the support‑staff agreement by motion (mover: Ms. Powell; seconder: Ms. Hogan). Both motions passed on voice vote with all members present voting aye.

Next steps: Administrators said the district will proceed with implementation while monitoring state developments and will adjust if the statute is ultimately enforced. Dr. Toon and other staff encouraged continued engagement with employee groups to preserve educator voice regardless of statutory changes.

Ending: Board members expressed appreciation for the negotiation teams and for the district’s bargaining partners; no further actions on the contracts were scheduled at the meeting.","The Davis School District board voted to ratify negotiated agreements with the Davis Education Association (teachers) and the Davis Education Support Professionals, while presenters said implementation could change if state legislation (HB 267) is enforced.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

District staff brief board on school improvement (land trust/TSSA) plans and new review app; board asked to review before June approval

Board approves districtwide hands‑on math intervention after public questions about future state standards

Board approves first‑through‑third grade boundary shift from Eagle Bay to Canyon Creek; concludes broader Antelope Drive study

Davis School Board ratifies teacher and support‑staff contracts amid state law uncertainty