[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6244330,"mediaKeyId","3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011","parentId",3230395,"title","Senator warns advertising bill risks unconstitutional censorship; Arizona Senate passes measure","audioSeconds",151,"startMs",2392000,"endMs",2543000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011&start=2392&end=2543","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011/thumbnail_2392000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6244330/Arizona/Senator-warns-advertising-bill-risks-unconstitutional-censorship-Arizona-Senate-passes-measure","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6244330-496a4b2fc797cff8e84b6d86fbff5292/orig.mp4?Expires=1773578841&Signature=niVexxofdZiJmS1xBNFzpT6GcI7haPgFO8fGtNUId6EOF5EB-k1YzXSJT92CaUvWQNn9sln-r-PeyY1scRY7JbuvtrSMf8Xw1L8O-94SP7HB321LBxjN9qL-IMAdGbGP~VwJVRNOflLs7uYsYwuZUl3eutuxW0r5BYPR7IfDD1R1IEK1gH7o6rOayYX3MsDRTQGEO5HPZ~bzyfEHAAxmEDlepAfnJybb-abQ9v1Pu9KtDYJRAE9HqxtLDBfETxccVR-3iGx26t7BfphMPEeZ-FaP1hgWYOP0KYd1P2o-OUeED3Oyv2fe-ml1CQl0nnPUAKekEd97Rko2CtonIt9qaQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Arizona Legislature","date","2025-05-07T00:00:00Z","article","House Bill 2195, a measure concerning advertising regulation described by a floor speaker as limiting certain content directed at children, generated a sharp critique on constitutional grounds but passed the Senate on May 7.

Senator Annalise Ortiz told colleagues she viewed the bill as an unconstitutional form of government censorship. \"HB 2,195 is unconstitutional government censorship,\" Ortiz said on the floor, warning that broad authority in the bill could allow the attorney general to deem many apps and platforms as directed at children and censor movie previews, game trailers, or educational material.

Ortiz said the bill's scope — as described in committee testimony — was driven by a parent’s experience viewing an in-game advertisement and cautioned that the statute’s language would give the attorney general sweeping discretion to regulate content across apps and websites. \"Because HB 21 95 threatens access to the internet and gives the AG broad authority to censor apps they deem violate the law, this is unconstitutional and members should vote no,\" Ortiz said.

Despite Ortiz’s warnings, the clerk recorded the final vote and the measure passed on the Senate floor; the bill was transmitted per chamber practice. The roll call in the transcript that immediately follows Ortiz’s remarks shows the bill passed and was signed in open session.

Why it matters: The debate centers on the tension between efforts to shield children from certain content and constitutional protections for speech. Floor opponents flagged possible overbroad enforcement by the attorney general; floor proponents argued the bill targets specific protections for minors.

Outcome: HB 2195 passed on the Senate floor and was transmitted according to standard procedure; the transcript records the sponsor’s critique and the final vote but does not include detailed enforcement language from the bill text in floor debate.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","05/07/2025 - Senate Floor Session","oneSentenceSummary","Senator Ortiz argued that House Bill 2195, described by critics as restricting advertisements targeted at children, poses constitutional risks. Despite lengthy floor criticism, the Senate passed the bill and transmitted it onward.","taxTitle","2025 Legislature Arizona, Arizona","taxId",78572,"location","Arizona","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6244335,"Senate advances life-care contract bill with longer waiting period and delayed start date",548,952000,1500000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011&start=952&end=1500","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011/thumbnail_952000.jpg","/articles/6244335/Arizona/Senate-advances-life-care-contract-bill-with-longer-waiting-period-and-delayed-start-date","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6244335-6f1e6a05778e633237ac4efda48e6f27/orig.mp4?Expires=1773578841&Signature=jRdaPiXWKyxyLsH1SQGdQcWK5jy3qiZUC1UUnuGWNmYh49OtD-b6ay4Mtmzk9GKzZ5zmG5-OwrndPvLPDIi61ZKzgihWGLHymJf4zEPuH-aMUHwz18PCthP~Pg7VmvyaT-BRFx3dEK5rHEewxin6sdncBQ137twLnxsDlWYV5l2OMIyWZtCa3C6E6iCqkJMUPOpKf-xdkMTuhYIobfNZTRGdn41on-FfHx2UcgWP-Yp9p7mIwzvOjW~F8RJQn1pyI0ek3jsDtVFrG6yf~KcZLqrmyq-3XXxBDjytCS55T7MZXxsqfYc0PV0D28coViQS-8-POLnqhtE7k9vZ0GrkJQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona Senate considered House Bill 2370, a measure affecting life care contracts, and approved finance and floor amendments before passing the bill on third reading.

Senator JD Mesnard and other committee sponsors described a floor amendment that altered the waiting period in statute from two years to three years and set an effective start date for covered contracts beginning Jan. 1, 2026. \"The highlights are that it changes from 2 years to 3 years, the time frame for the waiting period... and we set a future, start date essentially for contracts beginning after January first of 2026,\" a sponsor said on the floor.

Senators moved and adopted a finance committee amendment and a sponsor floor amendment; there was no extended floor debate recorded. The final roll call recorded 26 ayes, 0 nays and 4 not voting; the secretary recorded passage and the bill was transmitted following standard procedure.

Why it matters: The bill alters contract timing and waiting-period language for life care arrangements, and the sponsor said the amendments establish a clear future effective date so that covered contracts are subject to the new timeframe beginning in 2026.

Next steps: Following the Senate vote the bill was transmitted per chamber rules for the legislative process.","The Senate approved House Bill 2370, which makes changes to statutes governing life care contracts. Floor amendments extended a waiting period from two to three years and set an effective start date for contracts beginning after Jan. 1, 2026; the bill passed with unanimous support in recorded vote.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6244340,"Senate advances groundwater replenishment bill after amendment favoring Pinal County",510,1118000,1628000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011&start=1118&end=1628","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011/thumbnail_1118000.jpg","/articles/6244340/Arizona/Senate-advances-groundwater-replenishment-bill-after-amendment-favoring-Pinal-County","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6244340-314d31a866d6ac0fa88931fac514cb31/orig.mp4?Expires=1773578841&Signature=gZGaCLg4i6Kw6eUAIVYiYzC7ZnP1j2eB6ZYAvqnTqtgroBY59x8Lk~A8k9sU6OP18jIC-G31rImn4dLdKzj5MXLoREUboQBxFOj80Pnd9-OmlexBdO3wTTjVDH36927oocbObGeHmZCrh7UI639BKgSzhhwsp1qTjtXsxDXqMEzb7~~apg17JZYYpE8GqPZMeYeqfFLK8Y3ovCb-rDUB7IbropSwwpTe8AMSN~FVVS~rrqqNhX380T45rVZNYVpLro8U-5pTe~iYjWLt6HPIPJj4nLLNai4TXbfkJoXrZAwLx4dHXV96pBw1Ge1V624whKUwJAzogAiMr8-HJHmhAQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona Senate passed House Bill 2753 on May 7, a measure concerning groundwater replenishment and municipal provider obligations; the bill passed on third reading by 25 ayes, 1 nay and 4 not voting.

Sponsor Senator Thomas C. J. Shope moved a floor amendment that removed prohibitions that had barred municipal designation of providers from requiring owners of subdivided lands to provide or pay for water sources to reduce off-parcel groundwater demands. “It removes the prohibition for a designation of a municipal provider on owners of lands that are subdivided after the date of the designation… and other conforming changes,” Shope said while describing the amendment.

Shope told senators the amendment reflected negotiations with the Arizona Department of Water Resources and the governor’s office and that the change was intended to ensure the bill could be signed into law. “We have worked with the department and we’ve worked with the governor's office to ensure that this very important bill for Pinal County is signed,” Shope said on the floor.

The amended bill passed third reading; the clerk recorded a vote of 25 ayes, 1 nay, and 4 not voting. The sponsor framed the change as necessary to address groundwater replenishment obligations and to allow municipal providers appropriate tools for managing water service commitments in growing areas.

Why it matters: HB 2753 affects municipal water-provider obligations and groundwater management, matters of direct consequence to communities in Pinal County and other areas facing water supply constraints.

Implementation notes: The sponsor said the bill was coordinated with the Department of Water Resources; no additional implementation schedule or specific funding was recorded in the floor debate.","The Senate passed House Bill 2753 with a floor amendment that removed certain prohibitions tied to municipal providers and subdivided land; sponsors said the change was coordinated with the Arizona Department of Water Resources and the governor’s office and stressed the bill’s importance for Pinal County groundwater management.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6244345,"Senate amends bill narrowing first-aid licensing exemption; final passage fails on tie",600,5798000,6398000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011&start=5798&end=6398","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011/thumbnail_5798000.jpg","/articles/6244345/Arizona/Senate-amends-bill-narrowing-first-aid-licensing-exemption-final-passage-fails-on-tie","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6244345-a20b23783ebbd6d1ff9ab1c8699da3f8/orig.mp4?Expires=1773578841&Signature=LmX0NU1xu2741U8ubf9mshjZ4VcxTRuII9Hb8ArBotvLYS4Acm7JAuY1swXrQn89iAmLzUKFfjl-up1TPMs2oMqD36ZCpoDskNKQWvSNKmPU~sqGGFNjVQMi4BsQg7sBt3lmZexbzaaU6NqRweSbZ0piIbtD8UENic8rnFU~DrS0pJKToDg1vwqr9A8RldzpZYQ62pvzVg0wQgFiMSzpoOuRR7nzsFHOsSaqEqZRSjpjSApzTaMAY6HLYZuhspceQYDlpgO01H1ke3kVVl5ld8KHxIkQovqa-pK7t4yJm7nGbERlM-BeRVopy4Qh1-fFNhcbfhBR8BvwI252VN98RA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona Senate debated House Bill 2052, which would have amended statutes governing the Arizona Medical Board to narrow a licensing exemption related to administering first aid. Senators adopted a Payne floor amendment that changed the bill’s scope; the bill later failed on final reading, 13-13 with four senators not voting.

The Payne floor amendment narrowed the licensing exemption to apply only when the person administering first aid first obtains the injured person’s consent. It required consent from a parent or legal guardian for injured minors under 15 and added a requirement to notify law enforcement about the injured person’s condition in those circumstances, among other changes. \"This amendment, will now narrow the first aid licensing exemption to apply only to the cases where individuals administering aid first obtain consent from the injured person,\" Senator Payne explained on the floor.

Supporters said the change clarified the circumstances in which non-licensed persons could provide aid. Opponents raised concerns about the amendment’s restriction on administering over-the-counter pain medication and potential liability issues. \"Just because they're over the counter does not mean that they're not toxic at levels that you'd be surprised at,\" the majority leader said, explaining reservations about allowing unlicensed individuals to administer medications.

Senators also debated how the proposal interacted with existing Good Samaritan protections. Senator Schamp noted that Good Samaritan laws already protect routine actions such as cleaning and bandaging minor wounds, and said the amendment focused primarily on medications and consent requirements. The final vote on third reading was tied at 13-13 with four not voting; under Senate procedure the bill failed to pass.

Why it matters: The bill sought to define the limits of volunteer or layperson action in medical situations and to clarify when licensing requirements apply — a policy area that intersects with public health, liability and emergency response.

Decision and next steps: The Payne amendment was adopted in committee-of-the-whole, but the full bill did not secure a majority on third reading and failed; no subsequent action was recorded during the session.","Lawmakers considered a House bill to modify medical-board licensing rules for first aid. The Senate adopted a floor amendment that narrowed exemptions — requiring consent and limiting nonprescription medication — but the measure failed on final reading, 13-13 with four not voting.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6244350,"Arizona Senate narrowly rejects resolution to call convention for congressional term limits",598,1681000,2279000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011&start=1681&end=2279","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230395-a4bfb24d9b9dd986605501c5aefe0011/thumbnail_1681000.jpg","/articles/6244350/Arizona/Arizona-Senate-narrowly-rejects-resolution-to-call-convention-for-congressional-term-limits","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6244350-fbe6799067b87bbcbe8215be1cd8ddfe/orig.mp4?Expires=1773578841&Signature=UJvBuAZ0Y2oZRL3K7u5QQmlp2Q6J9oeapUCWU9XajNQWqGc-EBo0Krxj6n4vkJw3B1wlG5it2nfFT9HkMsrIC3nJ5~mwUtm5QeAiTSgJDEohUKkBllm33zvPf0Ve~KwHURoOQj7MsQHGaKo9GxkySVqf-K3LkMo0c8UHtDITx0FYjqWXMu51cg23WHDt9e02toTvJeNi1zb6FqMKu-K0FeaCvNZElJrgPNAgsnyJhtfzXmwKxpsCv~2vLV9vw6nBAFHxI2Uoz5oOTKCySCWolsQTXYZFRSQ~vAUtA0ZOwVrW17clRlMO7-Y5nZEnJDztn4x361rJtlPc~nC-JORrgQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Arizona Senate voted on May 7 on House Concurrent Resolution 2041, a measure asking Congress to call an Article V convention to propose amendments limiting terms of office for members of the U.S. House and Senate; the resolution failed, 13-12 with five senators not voting.

Proponents said the resolution would pressure Congress to act on term limits. “Term limits do exactly that,” Senator Leach said during debate, urging support for the measure as a way to prompt congressional action on issues like a balanced budget amendment.

Opponents warned an Article V convention carries open-ended risks, saying a convention could extend beyond term limits and alter other constitutional protections. “I call this a great big risky game of chicken, and I am not willing to risk our rights that are enshrined in our U.S. Constitution with a game of chicken,” Senator Epstein said in explaining a no vote.

Supporters argued the prospect of a convention would compel Congress to change behavior without permitting a runaway process. Senator Leach told colleagues that state pressure would force congressional action rather than risk a convention.

The resolution moved through committee and received a due-pass recommendation before floor debate. Senators across the chamber offered extended explanations of their votes; the final roll call recorded 13 ayes, 12 nays and 5 not voting, and the resolution did not pass.

Why it matters: The proposal touched a national constitutional mechanism — Article V — and spurred sharp debate about the balance between using state leverage to force federal change and safeguarding the Constitution against unpredictable amendments. The vote leaves Arizona without a formal call to Congress for a convention on term limits.

What happened next: The resolution failed on final reading; no committee or staff direction to pursue alternative measures was recorded during the session.","The Arizona Senate debated a House concurrent resolution asking Congress to call an Article V convention to propose amendments limiting terms for U.S. representatives and senators. Lawmakers split on whether the move risks a ‘runaway’ convention; the measure failed on final count.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Senator warns advertising bill risks unconstitutional censorship; Arizona Senate passes measure

Senate advances life-care contract bill with longer waiting period and delayed start date

Senate advances groundwater replenishment bill after amendment favoring Pinal County

Senate amends bill narrowing first-aid licensing exemption; final passage fails on tie

Arizona Senate narrowly rejects resolution to call convention for congressional term limits