Dixon County Commission approves site plans for Tennessee Commercial Electric and U Storage

On May 8, 2025, the Dickson County Planning Commission convened to discuss several significant site plans and a rezoning request that could impact local development and zoning regulations. The meeting highlighted ongoing concerns about zoning practices and the implications of commercial development in the area.

One of the primary discussions centered around the site plan for Tennessee Commercial Electric LLC, located on Woodstown Hill Road. The commission approved the site plan, which includes a landscape buffer and perimeter security lighting. This approval reflects the commission's commitment to balancing commercial growth with community standards, as the property is adjacent to agricultural land. Commissioner Chase expressed no objections to the plan, indicating a consensus among members regarding its appropriateness.

Another notable agenda item was the site plan for U Storage Storage, which was recently rezoned from general commercial to a rural center district. This facility will feature self-storage units surrounded by a chain-link fence and landscaping. The approval of this site plan demonstrates the commission's willingness to accommodate storage facilities, which are increasingly in demand as urban areas expand.

The meeting also addressed a rezoning request for Tennessee Steel Buildings, which has been a point of contention. The request aims to change the zoning from agricultural to a rural center district to allow for light industrial activities. The commission revisited this request due to a procedural oversight regarding public notice requirements. The applicant's representative, Darryl James, emphasized the importance of this rezoning for the business's future operations. The commission's recommendation will ultimately be forwarded to the county commission for final approval.

Throughout the discussions, concerns were raised about setting precedents in zoning practices. One commissioner cautioned against allowing properties to remain zoned for commercial use without proper oversight, suggesting that all developments should adhere to established regulations. This sentiment reflects a broader concern about maintaining community standards and ensuring that new developments align with the county's long-term planning goals.

In conclusion, the Dickson County Planning Commission's meeting on May 8 underscored the complexities of managing growth and development in the region. As the commission navigates these issues, the outcomes of the approved site plans and the pending rezoning request will likely shape the future landscape of Dickson County. The next steps involve further deliberation by the county commission, where these recommendations will be evaluated for final decisions.