Charleston's emergency management updates on FEMA funding and disaster preparedness plans

The Charleston County Council convened on May 8, 2025, to discuss critical updates regarding emergency management and the implications of recent changes in Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) policies. The meeting featured a presentation by Justin Pierce, the new director of emergency management, who outlined the current state of FEMA and its potential impacts on Charleston County.

Pierce began by emphasizing the fluid nature of the situation, noting that updates from Washington, D.C., are frequent and often significant. He explained that FEMA is undergoing a transition that could shift responsibilities for disaster preparedness and recovery from the federal level to state and local governments. This change is driven by the current administration's desire to reduce federal costs and expedite assistance to disaster survivors.

Key points of discussion included the two main funding sources from FEMA: the Disaster Relief Fund, which supports major disaster declarations, and preparedness grants for hazard mitigation and training. Pierce highlighted that the administration aims to focus FEMA's resources on catastrophic disasters, defined as those exceeding $1 billion, which could significantly alter the funding landscape for smaller disasters.

Pierce also addressed the recent hold on preparedness grants, which has since been lifted, but the future of these funds remains uncertain. He warned that if the threshold for major disaster declarations increases—potentially up to $1 billion—many past disasters in South Carolina would not qualify for federal assistance, placing a heavier financial burden on state and local governments.

The council was informed that Charleston County has historically benefited from federal disaster recovery reimbursements, totaling over $30 million in the past decade. However, with potential changes in federal policy, the county may need to prepare for a slower response and reduced federal support in future disasters.

To mitigate these risks, Pierce recommended several proactive measures for the county, including updating the emergency operations plan, building financial reserves, and strengthening partnerships with state and regional entities. He also stressed the importance of prioritizing hazard mitigation projects and enhancing community preparedness to ensure residents are ready for potential disasters.

In conclusion, the council's discussions underscored the need for Charleston County to adapt to the evolving landscape of disaster management and funding, emphasizing a collaborative approach to preparedness and resilience in the face of uncertain federal support.