Maricopa County Board discusses employment verification policy changes amid cost concerns

A significant policy shift was discussed at the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors meeting on May 7, 2025, as officials considered making employment verifications optional for new hires. This proposal, aimed at reducing costs and expediting the hiring process, sparked a heated debate among supervisors.

Supervisor Lesko raised concerns about the potential risks of allowing optional employment verifications, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that applicants provide accurate information about their work history. "Some people lie on their employment applications," she stated, expressing discomfort with the proposed changes. In response, county officials highlighted that current practices already include extensive background checks, including criminal history and social security validation, which would remain unchanged.

The justification for the policy change centers on rising costs associated with employment verifications, which have surged from $13.60 in 2020 to nearly $96 per check in 2025. Officials argued that the majority of employers contacted for verification provide limited information, often only confirming dates of employment and job titles, which diminishes the value of the checks. They noted that only a couple of discrepancies arise each year, suggesting that alternative methods, such as reference checks during interviews, could suffice.

Despite the cost-saving rationale, some supervisors remained skeptical. Supervisor Stewart questioned whether the policy would apply to sensitive positions, such as those in law enforcement, and suggested implementing random employment checks to deter misrepresentation. The board ultimately decided to continue the discussion and gather more information, postponing a vote on the proposal until the next meeting.

This policy shift reflects broader trends in public sector hiring practices, balancing efficiency and cost with the need for thorough vetting of candidates. As the county navigates these changes, the implications for workforce integrity and public trust remain a critical focus for supervisors and constituents alike.