[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6244424,"mediaKeyId","3230167-a9b18ea6ff620f6c9a88259abd0a6279","parentId",3230167,"title","Amendment to H.222 would make failure to finish court‑ordered domestic violence program potentially criminal, committee hears","audioSeconds",414,"startMs",3270000,"endMs",3684000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230167-a9b18ea6ff620f6c9a88259abd0a6279&start=3270&end=3684","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230167-a9b18ea6ff620f6c9a88259abd0a6279/thumbnail_3270000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6244424/Vermont/Amendment-to-H222-would-make-failure-to-finish-courtordered-domestic-violence-program-potentially-criminal-committee-hears","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6244424-711a4a66f4433dde92c97bdb9b92c3eb/orig.mp4?Expires=1770414522&Signature=ZSerYXDMmnNkTTtC9iX-4tS3MHUR4LK7cmMZHu2sqhOa1sNfoSejvt~iFsP9-BUwn6q8nv12D2U5knuNl~ri99jGo8P0B-pHys05s-gT2pzPjbbg-iawrAi99VXSc9XPl7C9bf-tV~Nc-gM1mzzASFcr304Xoujwaj-c5uoYRysjsSAHxkG7UhAd9srJK6YuwUKss4RAoCxCYNzhCU7B4kkE7LmqOUWIXoFnN~hOCM4W-NrTdpW-A-vAawJUcLkPxHDY6tSUzhocSxDwWxZXzSw2iMjpi59JKZIesQYL7BOZqlly2WqcnOA~GoSZcIA9oE6taq22ntP2VMcezhY9~Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-05-09T03:11:44Z","article","Michelle Trout of the Office of Legislative Counsel explained to the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 8 that an amendment to H.222 would change how courts may treat a defendant’s failure to complete court‑ordered domestic violence accountability programming.

Trout said the proposal applies to final Title 15 family abuse protection orders (not ex parte emergency orders). The house version had language specifying that failure to complete an approved domestic violence accountability program “shall not be considered a crime and is not a violation of section 10 30, but could subject the defendant to civil contempt proceedings.” The amendment before the Senate removes that language, which would make the programming requirement enforceable like other conditions of a final protection order and therefore potentially prosecutable under the criminal statute cited in testimony (13 V.S.A. §1030 was discussed in committee testimony as the misdemeanor for violating civil protection orders).

“Your proposal in this amendment is just striking that language. So the default would be that it would just be like any other condition of the final order, and a state's attorney could choose to charge under 1030 a violation,” Trout said during the hearing.

Committee members voiced differing views on consistency and enforcement. One senator said he preferred uniform treatment: if a court order condition can lead to criminal penalty in other cases, it should be consistent for programming. Another committee member noted concerns that programming can be ongoing and “it can take up to 26 weeks,” and questioned how participation would be monitored; Trout replied the Council on Domestic Violence has criteria for when a participant is considered to be actively participating versus having dropped out.

No final committee vote was taken on the amendment at the May 8 meeting. Committee leaders said they would take a straw poll when the full committee is present, and the house will decide whether to accept any Senate changes. Multiple speakers agreed the issue should not block the bill’s progress; the committee planned to reconvene and consider the amendment formally at the next full committee meeting.

Discussion points: whether failure to complete a court‑ordered domestic violence accountability program should be a criminal violation (like other order conditions) or only subject to civil contempt; monitoring and definition of “participation” in programs; potential inconsistency across types of protection orders.

Direction assigned (not a formal vote): committee will take further consideration, including a straw poll with a full committee; staff and members will confer with the Council on Domestic Violence and House sponsors before a final vote.

Decisions: none formalized at the hearing; the committee did not adopt or reject the amendment on May 8.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Senate Judiciary 2025-05-08 - 10:00AM","oneSentenceSummary","Michelle Trout of the Office of Legislative Counsel told the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 8 that an amendment to H.222 would remove language shielding failure to complete an approved domestic violence accountability program from criminal prosecution, making it enforceable like other conditions of a final Title 15 protection order.","taxTitle","Judiciary, SENATE, Committees, Legislative , Vermont","taxId",47267,"location","Vermont","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6244428,"Chair of Racial Disparities Panel says lack of staff and data hobbles equity review; announces resignation",2397,963000,3360000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230167-a9b18ea6ff620f6c9a88259abd0a6279&start=963&end=3360","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230167-a9b18ea6ff620f6c9a88259abd0a6279/thumbnail_963000.jpg","/articles/6244428/Vermont/Chair-of-Racial-Disparities-Panel-says-lack-of-staff-and-data-hobbles-equity-review-announces-resignation","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6244428-a62f6d89e692bdee5df34773ce9800d0/orig.mp4?Expires=1770414522&Signature=nsXUEC3Tv7ont7aeHau8C8~ljFVaZk2iHzUwlKCr9x~lw8wDzb6VBPGmgjbBUcuZJ9UF9F~sE3cPy3xz-GIgRr~fPkNlUEF63jMPnd47h61i6uHDgjDsb0TOG7dQ2kDyAt9uFD3FpqUAMi-gGL2UlfVSR-a734dnWbGo7ij7f87SLDd5wxo8xRNkX5xX7lz-g9JAOe8OvYUrHSptcnIlxKMQDB9KEySQkfiNQz9sjd7ncwO4MYvdWcMyOpLHQ2Qjrlm9lvOVljAkKPUUoKdH7gboQIH9sn6mKBY161p3VOCsObH5ZheVD7dupKeNNnftN3xF7hi-6-rFW~zTRUK4kA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Eitan Ness Redlongo, chair of the Racial Disparities Advisory Panel, told the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 8 that the panel cannot carry out its mandate without dedicated staff, reliable data access and more frequent, focused work during the legislative session, and said he will resign from the panel.

Redlongo said the panel currently meets once a month for two hours on the second Tuesday from 6 to 8 p.m., which he called insufficient to track bills that often change rapidly. “There is a fundamental incompatibility between the way the RDAP is structured and the way the legislature was structured,” he said. “We need legislators to be there who are interested in this study.”

The panel’s duties include producing biennial reports on criminal and juvenile justice and reviewing proposed legislation for equity impacts. Redlongo and other witnesses told the committee that the Division of Racial Justice Statistics (DLJS), created after prior justice‑reinvestment work, is overextended and cannot reliably keep up with rapidly changing bill text or produce timely analyses without clearer data-sharing agreements and more staff time.

“By statute, you should have access to that data,” a senator on the committee told Redlongo; Redlongo responded that some departments do not keep the needed data or are reluctant to share it, and that memoranda of understanding between agencies are incomplete. He described problems with incompatible agency data systems and proprietary vendor platforms that impede cross‑agency analysis.

Redlongo and several committee members discussed institutional models to address the problem. Multiple speakers compared the need to the Joint Fiscal Office (JFO), which evaluates fiscal impacts of bills: “We actually already have a model to do this,” one committee member said, suggesting a staffed legislative office to perform equity impact assessments for bills that show movement.

Representatives of the Attorney General’s Office and the RDAP also said the panel should clarify and focus its legislatively defined charge (a committee member referenced the enabling statute) and consider subcommittees or more frequent meetings during session to triage the greatest‑impact bills. Redlongo proposed that the panel create subcommittees and rank bills by likely equity impact so limited time and personnel can be used efficiently.

Several participants warned against siloing equity work within a single named office, such as an Office of Racial Equity. Redlongo said placing all equity review in one office risks consigning responsibility rather than integrating equity review across agencies and the legislature.

Committee members pledged follow‑up. One senator offered to explore legislation that would authorize RDAP to form subcommittees and to “introduce the bill” if needed. No formal motion or vote occurred during the hearing.

Redlongo said he will remain available as a “shadow” adviser after his resignation and urged a group approach to fix systemic problems: “We have to get everybody in the room,” he said. The committee did not adopt a final plan at the hearing but scheduled further discussion and a possible joint hearing with the House on the topic.

Discussion points: lack of dedicated RDAP staff; DLJS capacity and data access problems; incompatible agency data systems; limited meeting schedule; danger of siloing equity work; proposal to use a JFO‑style model or authorized subcommittees.

Direction assigned (not a formal vote): committee members agreed to continue the discussion at future hearings, explore legislation to authorize subcommittees, and consider a staffed, institutionalized approach to equity assessments.

Decisions: none formalized at the May 8 meeting.

Ending: The committee set a follow‑up to discuss models and possible statutory changes; Redlongo said he will submit the panel’s required biennial report as appropriate but exchanged no final plan for staffing or statutory amendment during this meeting.","Eitan Ness Redlongo, chair of the Racial Disparities Advisory Panel, told the Senate Judiciary Committee on May 8 that the panel cannot carry out its mandate without dedicated staff, reliable data access and more frequent, focused work during the legislative session, and said he will resign from the panel.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Amendment to H.222 would make failure to finish court‑ordered domestic violence program potentially criminal, committee hears

Chair of Racial Disparities Panel says lack of staff and data hobbles equity review; announces resignation