[{"_1":2,"_112":-5,"_113":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6563292,"mediaKeyId","3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0","parentId",3230798,"title","Work session: committee advances three Senate bills (SB7, SB121, SB359) with motions to amend and do pass","audioSeconds",722,"startMs",135000,"endMs",857000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0&start=135&end=857","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0/thumbnail_135000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6563292/Nevada/Work-session-committee-advances-three-Senate-bills-SB7-SB121-SB359-with-motions-to-amend-and-do-pass","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6563292-fc85e68969ba1ef09f6b7ed6c3f80f3f/orig.mp4?Expires=1773733708&Signature=IP73G9RxUAJtXxvokkdQ7D4~eGxAst7ViI-wL0tYBlME-jY7JTRyo-7wZy3ewIRJHV~puX2jvaC5BOBP8m~~9SkUBSlMvnRR4YivnvdxEZro7uGyEJ7bmU6voIv1PFwxreOfktbJjQ8WoVx7GnOHP~upM-lxcreXOtMRzyp1LKnE9QLvGz68pEjJDyrk8T2vJBWVWV~g6ZJvrS36AyVg0MtvU~5sbfcB6Xp49XNyJVFmn1MVGWX1IawiZiNpninGXUcTIhSAXL2EcDrWNqZCHikMvX029eoOLIwlPWcBbTV96zkJcRQ-BFHT5MyKaCNj45QZ7WUQm0eCwf0NkTSA4w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Nevada Legislature","date","2025-05-09T04:40:14Z","article","The Assembly Judiciary Committee conducted a work session in which members moved to amend and give a do-pass recommendation on three Senate bills.

Cesar Magarejo, the committee policy analyst, presented the items and described the amendments under consideration. For Senate Bill 7 (revising provisions related to presentence investigations and reports, sponsored by the Senate Committee on Judiciary on behalf of the Division of Parole and Probation) the committee accepted an amendment clarifying that either the sentencing court or the county clerk may request a presentence investigation and report to reflect administrative differences across counties. Vice Chair Marzola moved to amend and do pass; Assemblymember LaRue Hatch seconded. Assemblymember Gray stated he would vote in favor but reserved the right to change his vote if new information emerged. The motion passed unanimously; the committee assigned a floor statement to Assemblymember Delia.

For Senate Bill 121 (revising provisions governing common-interest communities), Magarejo reported the sponsor would accept only the amendment to section 1, shortening landscaping and rock-installation restriction periods (36 months to 24 months for backyard landscaping and 18 to 12 months for thin rock) measured from close of escrow for the initial purchase from the declarant. Vice Chair Marzola moved to amend and do pass; Assemblymember Nadine seconded. The motion passed with recorded nays from Assemblymembers Hardy, Gray, Cole, Urich and Hansen. The committee assigned a floor statement to Assemblymember Moore.

For Senate Bill 359 (various changes relating to traffic offenses), the committee considered late-filed amendments that expand or clarify court procedures, allow remote testimony, permit consolidation of related cases and change procedures related to civil infractions, bonds, attorney representation, and penalties. Justin Watkins (Nevada Justice Association) explained the amendments during the hearing. Vice Chair Marzola moved to amend and do pass; Assemblymember Delia seconded. The motion passed; the transcript records nays from Assemblymembers Hardy, Gray, and Anne Hanson. The committee assigned the floor statement to Assemblymember LaRue Hatch.

The transcript records mover and seconder names for each motion and lists specific members who voted \"nay\" on SB121 and SB359. The committee documented assignment of floor statements for each advanced bill. The transcript does not provide full roll-call tallies for all members for each motion beyond the listed nays and the unanimous passage noted for SB7.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","5/8/2025 - Assembly Committee on Judiciary","oneSentenceSummary","The Assembly Judiciary Committee moved to amend and give a do-pass recommendation to three Senate bills during a work session: SB7 (presentence investigation clarifications), SB121 (common-interest community landscaping timelines), and SB359 (traffic offenses and related court procedures).","taxTitle","2025 Legislature NV, Nevada","taxId",78440,"location","Nevada","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6563297,"Committee hears SB201 to bar most HOA bans on small religious door displays; supporters cite mezuzah and ritual harms",3702,1656000,5358000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0&start=1656&end=5358","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0/thumbnail_1656000.jpg","/articles/6563297/Nevada/Committee-hears-SB201-to-bar-most-HOA-bans-on-small-religious-door-displays-supporters-cite-mezuzah-and-ritual-harms","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6563297-79ffceb4f3c74c27526538d71d802c90/orig.mp4?Expires=1773733708&Signature=TNfTwmwSY6jtZ-51ta93aWxURk~3g7DnN2q3y6x3VxmQ~WbjCz~sgDkG3I~lFRzBwR9qb5sM7BX09Hfup~feyWHsTcR446SvYLD4~wsK1ZTLiG3SSjhh5OWOrOr0QXl2V53ZfjUZiWxMFAlEXDmbzgVqolP2jIKNzBD6R9P7cWBcpumx4mX4QdIqIicDxIeTrp82HlPJ8TAYSrnihHjZ3i2JUYq7zJe0FvqigefufyN3yHMZZxQjDeJjb4V6-KlHuzYm8YTE5sOiO2kubtRZgULDmbdxQAcDreoxJfGZuCeHl0cFwUCBy0goJU~-vBddtfYIHn6CHdDOcyJl9aru~g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Sen. Julie Pizzina told the Assembly Judiciary Committee that Senate Bill 201 would prohibit homeowners associations and landlords from banning most religious items from entry doors and door frames, subject to limited exceptions. \"This bill is introduced to make sure that people living in HOA communities can still practice their religion and freely express their beliefs under the First Amendment,\" she said.

As amended and presented in committee, the bill protects displays affixed to an entry door or door frame so long as they are not larger than 36 by 12 inches or larger than the door or frame to which they are attached. Exceptions in the draft include displays that threaten health or safety, hinder the opening or closing of an entry door, violate federal, state or local law, contain obscene material, or \"promote discriminatory behavior.\" The bill also allows reasonable placement and manner restrictions and permits temporary removal for required maintenance after written notice; the association must return the display after work is complete. SB201 would void contrary provisions in governing documents on July 1, 2025, and requires unit owners and landlords to review and align policies by Oct. 1, 2025.

Witnesses supporting the bill included the Anti-Defamation League, the American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada, and the Hindu American Foundation. Elliot Mallon of the ADL described repeated incidents in Nevada where Jewish residents were told to remove a mezuzah, a small religious object affixed to door frames, and Sameer Kalra of the Hindu American Foundation said Hindus frequently hang items across doorframes as an expression of faith. Atar Hasibullah of the ACLU said the draft\u0000's change from \"discriminatory beliefs\" to \"discriminatory behavior\" helps avoid vagueness and potential First Amendment issues.

Supporters and a Nevada resident who testified by phone described cases in which mezuzahs were removed or residents received denial letters from property managers; one letter read, \"Your request is denied. Pursuant to your lease agreement, if your home is accessed by interior hall, no items are allowed in that common space. This includes the area to your dwelling unit.\" A representative of HOAs who testified in opposition asked that the provision allowing a prevailing party to recover attorney fees be deleted, warning it could increase litigation and financial burdens on communities.

Committee members asked for clarification about geographic scope (the bill protects front-door displays, not back or side yards), the meaning of \"reasonable\" restrictions, the \"reasonable period\" for written notice before an association may remove an item, and how removed items would be stored and returned. Witnesses said current practice in some instances results in discarded items and that the bill aims to create a documented, respectful process for temporary removal and return. The sponsor offered to work on specific time-frame language and to consider refining storage and handling language to avoid disrespectful treatment of religious artifacts.

SB201 drew supportive testimony from faith and civil-rights groups and at least one opposition comment from an HOA representative concerned about litigation and the prevailing-party clause. The committee closed the hearing without a committee vote recorded in the transcript.","Sen. Julie Pizzina told the Assembly Judiciary Committee that SB201 would bar most homeowners associations and landlords from prohibiting small religious items on entry doors and door frames, with limited safety and size exceptions.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6563305,"Committee hears bill to expand referrals to Nevada—Resiliency and Justice Center for crime victims",648,898000,1546000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0&start=898&end=1546","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0/thumbnail_898000.jpg","/articles/6563305/Nevada/Committee-hears-bill-to-expand-referrals-to-NevadaResiliency-and-Justice-Center-for-crime-victims","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6563305-a8b0d67f5392f1a92aa5f4cb0c848c85/orig.mp4?Expires=1773733708&Signature=MBcUXhqUnpjbPbrsAtfj9fyjRDoMe7raobM2UcfTlnKVG8KchOPpLDzl~M1bhRBpjInJDpt0dOsxLAlFBwFueweX33w-NK9beKMawuFpijUSY90G09V-Eiuj5VqIpmT0EmFkVPMYWD9AF083mLttTxLzRmlp0LdXkbtRTrMx73Mr32kwR3mrNjmS4-Ig6r4DAdyW0QXgZPJRygPxK7T5PH2zqvxHDjMmX3dYnnS8jLK8Q7XRm6gNoVgMXpy5dE6zdE3Q4DurvY~WjS70eqJJ8mWwBg3ZmGmXUpWiNPzVH1OkQJC-JMDjBFsb7YYbeqpPPnpRG97nN~GYYTZuk4riOw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Sen. John Steinbeck, sponsor of Senate Bill 125, told the Assembly Judiciary Committee on Oct. 26 that the bill would remove barriers that prevent law enforcement from sharing victim information with the Resiliency and Justice Center so more victims of violent crime across Nevada can receive services.

The measure seeks to ensure statewide access to the Resiliency and Justice Center, a multi-agency victim resource managed by the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada. \"This will allow more people to receive assistance in behavioral health, victims of crime compensation, legal assistance, and utilize additional local, state, federal, and nonprofit resources,\" Steinbeck said.

Supporters said the center, created after the 2017 Route 91 Harvest Festival shooting and currently located in Las Vegas, provides navigation of services for survivors, helps with Victims of Crime Compensation applications, and coordinates mental-health referrals when victims have trouble accessing care. Barbara Buckley, executive director of the Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada, described the center\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000\u0000's role: \"We assist the victim in filling out a Victims of Crime Compensation application, so their mental health co-pays are paid, so that they can more easily access the services they need to focus on recovery,\" she said.

Speakers representing Clark County and the city of North Las Vegas voiced support, and the Nevada District Attorneys Association also filed supporting testimony on record. No callers registered opposition or neutral testimony during the committee hearing, and Steinbeck closed by urging the committee's support so the center could address \"pinch points\" that prevent referrals.

The committee opened the hearing and took public testimony, but the transcript does not show a committee vote on SB125 during this session; the sponsor and supporters asked the committee to advance the bill. Testifying parties included the Resiliency and Justice Center team and local governments; no formal amendments or committee votes were recorded in the transcript for this item.

The bill would not itself create new victim services but would change the rules for sharing victim information to facilitate referrals to the existing center managed by Legal Aid Center of Southern Nevada. Testimony emphasized coordination with local law enforcement, Clark County, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and state behavioral-health partners. The sponsor and witnesses said the change is intended to increase access to existing supports rather than create a new program or a new funding stream.

The committee hearing concluded with no recorded opposition and no recorded committee action in the transcript. The measure will return to the committee or be scheduled for further action consistent with legislative procedure.

Details recorded during the hearing show the bill's intent and the organizations prepared to operate referral services rather than the committee's adoption of a final statutory text. Additional bill language, potential amendments, and any vote tally will appear in subsequent committee records if the committee moves SB125 forward.","Sen. John Steinbeck told the Assembly Judiciary Committee that SB125 would remove barriers to law enforcement sharing victim information with the Resiliency and Justice Center so more victims statewide can access behavioral-health, legal and compensation services.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6563301,"Committee hears bill to expand image-dissemination law to cover AI-generated 'deepfake' intimate images",1013,1659000,2672000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0&start=1659&end=2672","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3230798-59f937d75862eff55d6d6daaf334c5d0/thumbnail_1659000.jpg","/articles/6563301/Nevada/Committee-hears-bill-to-expand-image-dissemination-law-to-cover-AI-generated-deepfake-intimate-images","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6563301-e5017c503d7b96a7a2d25b4bbe693161/orig.mp4?Expires=1773733708&Signature=KAKxS1e33m453-u4VvMN3Ovwickknqepq1sgsaSFvPSKjSMSfN5dKlEACx0UvVoCDrtda9kwTlKPziw94Fp-SIYV2V5LEqpclDl0LgfvT8ePyuW~xNq7bcDVXM3YjRKwm4cUeCorrbFROecNKX6-bzOrkabbAELwn5Q7ghRNnusShWXmEF1DrWUnbtCPDtANGphElWYKGYrlof8F2YNpT~ba9ij2ClLHHLwd9ACvL-LAZ6KrxDlUhotzMmm0dPDYRalXZvSdVkGdeVK2ko6cxwtA0RZO~DK5kC9NsnuknB6ehWT4AX~1GN8enx0TVsd9-XsHoCw1ua1d7rTil-IHiA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Sen. Jeff Stone presented Senate Bill 213 to the Assembly Judiciary Committee on Oct. 26, saying the measure would expand Nevada\u0000\u0000's unlawful dissemination statute to cover photorealistic, AI-generated intimate images commonly called \"deepfakes.\" \"People in law enforcement can no longer tell the difference between real and AI generated imagery,\" Stone said. \"This bill provides law enforcement with clear guidelines to identify and prosecute offenders.\"

Jennifer Noble of the Nevada District Attorneys Association outlined the bill\u0000's elements: the definition of \"intimate image\" would be broadened to include photorealistic, digital, or computer-generated images that a reasonable person would believe depict an identifiable person\u0000\u0000\u0000's intimate body part or sexual conduct; to secure a conviction the state must prove the dissemination occurred knowingly and without the victim\u0000\u0000\u0000's consent. Noble said the bill retains an existing juvenile-exemption: \"No criminal liability would attach if the person who created and disseminated the image was under 18 years old.\"

Committee members asked clarifying questions about the scope of the bill. Assemblymember LaRue Hatch asked whether public figures are excluded from protection; Noble said yes, the current draft excludes public figures and the bill is narrowly tailored. Members raised concerns about youth-to-youth conduct; Noble said the juvenile exemption reflects current law and the bill was written to achieve consensus among prosecutors and defenders.

Law enforcement groups and prosecutors filed testimony in support. Jason Woodard of the Nevada Sheriffs and Chiefs Association said the association \"appreciates the sponsor bringing this language forward\" and that current law leaves enforcement \"tied hands\" in many cases involving generated images. Other supporters included the Washoe County Sheriff\u0000's Office, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, the City of Henderson and TechNet, which filed written support.

The hearing record shows no callers in opposition and no committee vote recorded in the transcript; the sponsor offered no final amendment on the record and did not request a committee vote during the session. The bill text discussed by presenters would make the elements of the offense: knowingly disseminating without consent a photorealistic or computer-generated image that a reasonable person would believe depicts an identifiable person's intimate body part or sexual conduct. The measure as presented is intended to allow prosecutors and law enforcement to pursue nonconsensual AI-enabled sexual-image harms that existing statute does not clearly cover.

Questions remain about how the statute will treat public figures and whether additional definitions or evidentiary rules will be required; sponsors and Noble said they are open to amendments and to working with committee members on scope and wording.","Sen. Jeff Stone and Jennifer Noble told the Assembly Judiciary Committee that SB213 would amend Nevada\u0000law to make knowingly sharing photorealistic AI-generated intimate images without consent a criminal offense; bill excludes juveniles and (as drafted) public figures; law enforcement and prosecutors testified in support.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Work session: committee advances three Senate bills (SB7, SB121, SB359) with motions to amend and do pass

Committee hears SB201 to bar most HOA bans on small religious door displays; supporters cite mezuzah and ritual harms

Committee hears bill to expand referrals to Nevada—Resiliency and Justice Center for crime victims

Committee hears bill to expand image-dissemination law to cover AI-generated 'deepfake' intimate images