The St. Helens City Council held a public hearing on May 8, 2025, addressing significant concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest among council members related to a zoning issue for a new police station. The meeting began with a council member disclosing a potential conflict due to her husband being a police officer in the city. This prompted a discussion about the objectivity of the council in light of ongoing litigation involving the police department.
During the hearing, a member of the public raised objections, stating that the council's involvement in a lawsuit against the police chief compromised their ability to make impartial decisions. The speaker argued that the council had already made a decision regarding the rezoning before the public hearing, suggesting a lack of transparency and fairness in the process.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free In response, the mayor emphasized that accusations do not equate to guilt and that due process must be followed. She asserted that the zoning issue was separate from the ongoing litigation and that the council could proceed without bias. Other council members echoed her sentiments, agreeing that the zoning amendment was necessary and unrelated to the current legal matters.
The council then outlined the procedural steps for the hearing, which included required statements, a staff report, and opportunities for public testimony. The council reiterated that all discussions and decisions would adhere to the St. Helens zoning code and relevant land use regulations.
As the meeting progressed, council members expressed their commitment to acting in the best interest of the city, despite the challenges posed by the accusations. The council's ability to navigate these concerns will be crucial as they move forward with the zoning decision and address public trust in their governance.