[{"_1":2,"_123":-5,"_124":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},"mediaId",6241762,"mediaKeyId","3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d","parentId",3253905,"title","Judge sentences woman to probation, orders rehab and monitoring after third-degree DWI plea","audioSeconds",908,"startMs",1908000,"endMs",2816000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d&start=1908&end=2816","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d/thumbnail_1908000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6241762/Texas/Judge-sentences-woman-to-probation-orders-rehab-and-monitoring-after-third-degree-DWI-plea","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6241762-8ab3b14813b1ae00bfcb9248222910c5/orig.mp4?Expires=1770756721&Signature=IjfLBSwwrBvgkdssLz0QuZEjHcWV3yfMgmhj3uag~IJtmd8koVQ8uoifghBqccL7Q1oyugsQJccwEfteYnG0Fd~yP-ifr4ievs5TsyXKuszRZjDXZ1VXfSaUshTB1rlIOZy0s1P4T851rdkjc4sMWeNnHoUkDQ7W0P5QDIGbu1hjY8eFNgDdVg1v~YUqVnp~XArUZ2NUX9UF9gbsz-RMnVGBo12zU8Gajm2js29eIUxcbibi0WTjOdzRyk-GsEEMyyGcyN4phqGEfoT1HzwI2A-FOYyTHtO1Gkns9CQjeQG82QBkE2jwQoxAkixAC5ma3c5yD69Sv760YxGP93mQxw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","","date","2025-05-09T17:49:37Z","article","Judge Stephanie Boyd, 187th District, sentenced Rebecca Davis after she entered a plea in a third-degree driving-while-intoxicated case, telling the court she understood the plea and the court’s admonishments.

The court accepted the plea and “will sentence you to 8 years in prison, suspended and probated for 6 years,” Boyd said. The sentence carries a $2,000 fine recommendation from the state and multiple probation conditions the judge adopted.

Why it matters: A third-degree felony DWI carries significant prison exposure and collateral consequences. The judge balanced a prison range against the defendant’s treatment status and authorized intensive supervision and treatment conditions intended to reduce public-safety risk while keeping Davis in the community.

Most important details: The court ordered Davis to remain on community supervision for six years and required continued treatment at SOVA (a residential/partial hospitalization substance-use program), regular reporting by Zoom or in person, a two-year driver’s-license suspension, and 200 hours of community-service restitution. The court also allowed the 10-day custodial condition the state sought to be served as a 10-day lockdown at the treatment facility instead of 10 days in the Bexar County Jail, provided the facility verifies she remained on campus. The judge told probation to obtain an appropriate release so the court can confirm program participation.

Judge Boyd discussed alternatives to GPS monitoring, saying that because Davis was in a residential lockdown at SOVA the court would not require GPS while she was fully confined. The judge instructed Davis to sign releases so probation could verify courses and testing at the facility, and she ordered ignition-interlock or a portable alcohol-monitoring device as appropriate, with ignition interlock for part of the term or an affidavit of nondriving, depending on program needs.

State recommendations and court orders differed in some particulars: the state asked for community supervision recommendations, including 200 hours of community service and a TAP evaluation; the court adopted many of the state’s recommendations but set probation length and conditions in the judge’s order. The judge emphasized that the court need not follow state recommendations and that the defendant must comply with probation and treatment to avoid revocation.

Context and next steps: Davis told the court she had been in and out of treatment and was participating in SOVA’s program at the time of sentencing. The court instructed probation to monitor Davis’s compliance and to ensure evaluations and testing are documented; probation will report to the court if conditions are not met. The judge reminded the defendant that a felony conviction carries firearms prohibitions and other collateral consequences.

Quotations in context: On imposing sentence, Boyd said, \"You could easily kill someone. You understand?\" and then explained the court’s decision to impose a probated sentence tied to intensive treatment.

Sources: Proceedings in the 187th District Court on the day the plea and sentencing were entered.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","FRI., MAY 9, 2025/JUDGE STEPHANIE BOYD/187TH DISTRICT COURT/MORNING DOCKET & JURY: STATE VS RENDON","oneSentenceSummary","Judge Stephanie Boyd sentenced Rebecca Davis after she entered a plea in a third-degree driving-while-intoxicated case, imposing eight years in prison suspended for six years of probation and ordering intensive treatment and monitoring.","taxTitle","Judge Stephanie Boyd 187th District, District Court Judges, Judicial, Texas","taxId",66298,"location","Texas","headline","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6241749,"Judge grants deferred adjudication in robbery case, requires treatment and community service",409,12435000,12844000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d&start=12435&end=12844","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d/thumbnail_12435000.jpg","/articles/6241749/Texas/Judge-grants-deferred-adjudication-in-robbery-case-requires-treatment-and-community-service","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6241749-491eae4f504dee366a1c5853d4b9312a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770756721&Signature=ZdH1~baXEuc9Ob8ZGqxtdK5XWvuilOvabBcxm4eJ638LgaG3cjc2fEHpe9wMWkNs4lQW3ycTwxSXWrS4lRzv1ueV0oPQ5pn6EhlaXTFre5LwZ8fxywkdJAqHKTDVB1uzCbe4y2TtMTZqenpmH9i-1mQl6dluFkkNYeA-WvUHp5ylYMdAX7ag1ob4kZfExkv-AWFflINArMowHPsGPtL0WsmOINfNCs9YZAZYKmREQhl~RfS1OY7i24rFtOxqOCS12Q8td92SuG7wBlsQh9zCclq8UP0G4CC7EEVtxAgABAPsXJp8ei~x6FVP8n8HnIchIMc1uaONZCyf9oQ0udlq8w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Jessica Alcazar pleaded no contest to a lesser-included robbery charge and was placed on four years’ deferred adjudication by Judge Stephanie Boyd in the 187th District Court.

Court proceedings show Alcazar reviewed discovery and pleadings with counsel and voluntarily entered the plea; the state proceeded on the lesser-included offense and the court accepted stipulations into evidence. The judge imposed four years of deferred adjudication, 100 hours of community-service restitution and parenting classes; the court also ordered random UAs, regular reporting and a mental-health evaluation to be completed out of custody where possible.

Why it matters: Deferred adjudication allows the court to withhold a formal finding of guilt while imposing supervision and conditions; failure to comply can lead to revocation and conviction. The judge stressed that medication and continuity of care are important and told the defendant to report to a local health center on release for medication and follow-up.

Additional conditions and instructions: The court required proof of employment or disability within 45 days of release, field visits once per month until further notice, and parenting classes with community-service hours deemed satisfied upon completion. The judge told probation to undertake evaluations and warned that failure to follow through would result in motion to revoke.

Sources: On-the-record courtroom exchange and plea paperwork accepted by the court.","Jessica Alcazar pleaded no contest to a lesser robbery count; Judge Stephanie Boyd deferred adjudication for four years and ordered 100 hours of community service, parenting classes and a mental-health evaluation, with standard probation reporting and drug testing.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6241753,"Trial in assault case highlights conflicting witness accounts and surveillance video; defense disputes edited footage",836,6260000,7096000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d&start=6260&end=7096","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d/thumbnail_6260000.jpg","/articles/6241753/Texas/Trial-in-assault-case-highlights-conflicting-witness-accounts-and-surveillance-video-defense-disputes-edited-footage","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6241753-0da70599d44300ee63d5c9cbef32bef3/orig.mp4?Expires=1770756721&Signature=OnkxJqFK~2rixxPovhgt7uXSl4AoSRwweo1AtxSiJU8hFZSHsJZei5FoT1b1ua9mJvMz7wniBHW8-9SWgknEPbztfED2MXgHCQBmdyNKEOe4Bq8OqwpQrhydcAECJU22FZgRQ-Jsqhh2aAD~XcYB4m3FgU4HH7Mh8bXFjzqNh~dAUDBA46buqNIMUuMvbwG9J3-ifLumc7kooSDBtK7jNpbiHXcY302snX1m3m~JKPCNfpQVVOJFoFQ5yAkkyEA89iVCXJH9xE4gVW02NvL01uqfqIrx~BmU2UepNtuHF4YFRa8vJ4fJOMsG7VXkQhGN9YDJOIE9-eF4tvVYAKZMQg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","A jury hearing in Bexar County examined testimony and surveillance evidence in the case against Mariano Rendon, who faces aggravated-assault allegations stemming from a brawl at Joe’s Volcano.

Prosecution and defense witnesses gave conflicting accounts of how a violent encounter unfolded on the club’s dance floor. Witnesses described a security guard, Anthony, being overpowered by multiple people while other staff and porters attempted to intervene. Several witnesses testified they saw wrestling, people “jumping on” a man and a tug of war over a radio and a drink. One witness (Tina Jimenez) acknowledged on cross-examination that she told the defendant in a recorded phone call, “He had a little more to drink. It was his birthday,” language the defense used to undercut claims the victim was severely intoxicated.

Surveillance video entered at trial shows portions of the incident; the prosecution played excerpts that it said captured a security guard being struck or kneed while on the ground. Defense witnesses—including porters and staff who were working the night of the incident—told the jury they did not personally see a knee strike and said the footage shown in court was not the full recording of the event. The judge permitted the short clips to be played for witnesses and the jury while the defense argued that portions of the video and longer recordings were not shown.

Why it matters: The dispute over what the video does and does not show and differences in witness recollection are central to whether the jury will find the defendant guilty of aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. The case turned on credibility, the completeness of surveillance footage and witness memory of chaotic events that occurred months earlier.

What witnesses said: Testimony documented the chaotic, physical nature of the altercation: one porter described three men on top of the security guard and said the situation felt dangerous because the guard carried a firearm. The defendant’s recorded phone conversation with a witness—the defense showed portions in court—was used to show inconsistency in the witness’s memory about how intoxicated the victim was.

Courtroom procedure: The judge managed objections over admissibility and sequencing of audio and video evidence and instructed witnesses not to discuss testimony outside of counsel. The jury was taken out briefly while the court resolved evidence-handling logistics. Multiple photos of the security guard’s injuries were admitted without objection and published to the jury.

Next steps: The trial will continue with additional testimony and exhibits; jurors will ultimately assess whether the defendant’s conduct meets the elements of aggravated assault and whether that conduct caused the serious injuries the state alleges.

Quotation in context: On cross-examination, one witness admitted after hearing recorded audio, “Yes. I did” make the statements about the victim’s drinking that the defense played to the jury.","Witnesses at the trial of Mariano Rendon described a large physical altercation at a nightclub; the defense and prosecution disputed what surveillance video shows, with defense witnesses saying they did not see a knee strike while prosecution played recorded phone audio and surveillance excerpts.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6241757,"Man accepts deferred adjudication for indecency count; judge imposes decade-long supervision and no-contact with minors",290,4142000,4432000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d&start=4142&end=4432","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d/thumbnail_4142000.jpg","/articles/6241757/Texas/Man-accepts-deferred-adjudication-for-indecency-count-judge-imposes-decade-long-supervision-and-no-contact-with-minors","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6241757-51529e8fb2b4f0edbbb0723f9407c1bc/orig.mp4?Expires=1770756721&Signature=equk4Em51TVkH7KjYO6XGFwxjWL9Vw4b3FJCqKjxhz0ZP2e82uwMuNfM4v0SN~-eV9iTkyZ~uRRvinvbNFHVaF5pJpSw9N~MAUetwoLxnyq~a8jkHbfYEaXxLuDyz0X7cuErSepui02dSWgDNyAbEWOai4WJaga5dFB0B2CsJ8A4ppgDC562fu9LJ2AxkYVoUJMjcnLH5HY0kLNinbNVLppqVsxkRk8TUvImBRsOTgQ5Z4dwwhRXDdtKoxRxJx3a4HrI2XQtC5Z~QNcHrjEMeatnnL~uF65O0NiyDA8Z0eQ57ZjKN9-LieX32x40X9UupGLHQdeDwrzQFsc~5FxBNw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","In 2021 CR2011, Javier Herrera pleaded no contest to the lesser-included count of indecency with a child by contact and the court deferred a finding of guilt, imposing 10 years deferred adjudication and multiple conditions.

Assistant district attorneys told the court they were proceeding on count 2, and defense counsel confirmed the defendant’s understanding of the plea paperwork. The court found the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived a jury trial and accepted stipulations into evidence; it deferred adjudication as requested by the defendant.

Court orders and conditions: Judge Stephanie Boyd set a $1,500 fine, 10 years of deferred adjudication, no contact with the complainant, chapter 62 registration, regular in-person reporting, random UAs and a prohibition on residing in or having unsupervised contact with minors. The court ordered a 180-day Bexar County custodial condition as part of probation and a mental-health/treatment evaluation in custody, with field visits once per month. The judge declined to allow the defendant to reside with minors or be employed with minors or in home-health positions.

Why it matters: The count relates to alleged sexual contact with a person who is now an adult; the court noted the complainant is an adult and that the deferred adjudication resolves the case without a formal guilty finding while imposing long-term supervision and registration conditions that carry lifetime reporting implications.

Additional procedural items: Defense requested transfer of supervision to Cheyenne, Wyoming; the judge said transfer is possible but requires acceptance by the receiving jurisdiction. The court accepted victim-impact statements by phone and ordered probation follow-up, including compliance with recommended evaluations.

Sources: On-the-record plea and sentencing statements during the 187th District Court session.","Javier Herrera entered a no-contest plea to an indecency-by-contact count; the 187th District Court deferred a finding of guilt and placed him on 10 years’ community supervision with conditions including no contact with minors, chapter 62 registration and 180 days in county jail as a probation condition.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":56,"_74":56},6241760,"Court revokes supervision, sends Nathan Martinez to prison after admitting violations",296,3189000,3485000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d&start=3189&end=3485","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3253905-63982e4b7e373473bdeeb8df05079c2d/thumbnail_3189000.jpg","/articles/6241760/Texas/Court-revokes-supervision-sends-Nathan-Martinez-to-prison-after-admitting-violations","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6241760-616cda0fd923a752f502e582d34b158a/orig.mp4?Expires=1770756721&Signature=Uw53mH7zcN1xnptwknCt-bOxj~0bsVcYdv0eagygkkPoe5xNvSoSj0KnAT8dvgD0DHFgAll~MID0ij3dP7hOih3Pz9A9tZv4PK3xG3No9Sub72Wc0SVOUmgLcTzMIEcHhTuJFazkWYaLrFEZ5pEIlGFksXmJWvSuofTqS~Z4P4ascoGvHvDi0Dxo7WRnftESvUS9a4w~D7X8jIhqtl0JcnsdUUhylLoKUp95sJobCahcAK~jJvtOQH6xTyxRedLltg2BatDfQIzGSajQXOji2bRsan2xfwOAKm0nCaSfQh22GNU4Qkllyk5o8YC4e68pPPGLvyUjAMRtA4sOwDRXfg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Nathan Martinez admitted a violation of the terms of his community supervision in 02/2022 CR10261, and Judge Stephanie Boyd revoked supervision and imposed a three-year prison term with placement in a therapeutic community.

The court reviewed the motion to revoke and the defendant’s admission that he failed to report as directed and had multiple positive UAs. Martinez told the court he had resumed using drugs after a prior period of abstinence; defense counsel said Martinez had struggled to reestablish identification and access to services during that time.

After advisals and the court’s explanation of the consequences, Martinez elected to plead true to the violation. The judge told Martinez he faced up to eight years in prison for the offense but then stated the court’s disposition: it would revoke and sentence to three years in prison, with recommended placement in a therapeutic community. The court imposed special no-contact conditions: no contact with Daniel Pizzuto (spelled on the record) and Deborah Pizzuto and Desiree Sanchez, and no contact with minors.

Why it matters: A revocation converts community supervision into an executed sentence, removing the supervision alternative and placing the defendant into custody. The court emphasized the defendant’s need for residential drug treatment and told him he had to change his life to avoid a longer prison term in the future.

Court instructions and next steps: The judge ordered credit for time served and required the usual trial-court advisements and certification regarding waiver of appeal. The court also advised Martinez that his only two likely outcomes without change were continued incarceration or death by ongoing addiction; the judge encouraged the defendant to engage with treatment in custody.

Sources: On-the-record courtroom proceeding in the 187th District Court during the motion-to-revoke hearing.","Nathan Martinez admitted a violation of his community-supervision conditions; the court revoked supervision and sentenced him to three years in prison, committing him to a therapeutic community and imposing no-contact conditions.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Judge sentences woman to probation, orders rehab and monitoring after third-degree DWI plea

Judge grants deferred adjudication in robbery case, requires treatment and community service

Trial in assault case highlights conflicting witness accounts and surveillance video; defense disputes edited footage

Man accepts deferred adjudication for indecency count; judge imposes decade-long supervision and no-contact with minors

Court revokes supervision, sends Nathan Martinez to prison after admitting violations