Concerns over a proposed high-density townhome development dominated the Florence City Council meeting on May 12, 2025, as residents voiced their apprehensions about the impact on their neighborhoods. The discussion centered around a developer's request to rezone a property for townhomes, which could allow for up to 24 units. Residents from the nearby Villa Toscana community expressed strong opposition, citing the burden of maintaining extensive common areas and the need for additional buffer zones to protect their properties.
One resident proposed an extra 10-foot buffer zone along the property line to limit the number of units that could be built, arguing that similar concessions had been made in the past to appease neighboring communities. However, city officials clarified that the current zoning designation left little room for negotiation, stating that the proposed NC 6.3 zoning was the only option available for townhome development.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Council members acknowledged the residents' concerns but emphasized the need for affordable housing in Florence, with some suggesting that homeowners could take proactive measures to mitigate their issues. The council ultimately voted in favor of the rezoning request, with two members opposing the decision, highlighting the ongoing tension between community interests and the city's housing needs.
As the meeting progressed, city officials also addressed broader issues, including the need for state funding to tackle aging infrastructure and rising crime rates. The mayor expressed disappointment over the withdrawal of a significant funding request, which could hinder the city's ability to address these pressing challenges.
The council's decision on the townhome development marks a pivotal moment for Florence, balancing the demands for housing with the concerns of existing residents. Further discussions and potential amendments are expected as the council prepares for a second reading of the proposal.