In a recent meeting of the Kansas Behavioral Sciences Regulatory Board (BSRB), members grappled with pressing issues surrounding the regulation of behavior analysts in the state. The discussion, which took place on May 12, 2025, highlighted concerns about individuals misrepresenting themselves as certified behavior analysts, particularly in rural areas.

The board members expressed frustration over their limited authority to address these misrepresentations due to existing regulations. Specifically, they referenced KSA 65-7503, which currently does not grant the board jurisdiction to intervene in cases of professional misrepresentation. This limitation has left the board unable to take action against individuals who claim to be behavior analysts without proper certification.

During the meeting, a community member's case was brought to light, prompting discussions about the need for regulatory changes. Board members acknowledged that to enforce stricter measures, they would need to amend the existing legislation, a process that would require significant effort and collaboration.

As the meeting progressed, the board also aimed to set the agenda for the upcoming year, but discussions about behavior analysts took precedence, delaying other planned topics. The board members recognized the importance of maintaining high standards of care within the profession and expressed a desire to explore potential solutions to the regulatory gaps.

In a collaborative spirit, members discussed the possibility of referring the issue to the Complaint Review Committee (CRC) for further investigation. This would allow for a formal process to address complaints against individuals misrepresenting their qualifications. The board emphasized the importance of public safety and the need to uphold professional standards in the field of behavioral sciences.

The meeting concluded with plans for the next gathering on June 13, 2025, where members hope to continue their discussions and work towards actionable solutions. As the board navigates these challenges, the commitment to protecting the integrity of the profession remains a top priority.