Jacksonville residents demand action against new morgue and billion-dollar jail proposal

The City Council of Jacksonville, Florida, convened on May 13, 2025, to address pressing community concerns, particularly surrounding the proposed construction of a new morgue and forensic lab in the Brentwood neighborhood, as well as the ongoing issues related to the Jacksonville Sheriff's Office (JSO) and the city's budget allocations.

The meeting began with public comments highlighting significant opposition to the morgue's location. Residents expressed fears about air quality and health risks, particularly for children attending nearby schools. One speaker criticized the council for failing to conduct an environmental impact study, suggesting that the decision to place the morgue in Brentwood reflects a disregard for the community's well-being. The sentiment was echoed by multiple speakers who called for the repurposing of the morgue site, arguing that it should not be situated in a residential area.

Concerns about police accountability were also a focal point of the meeting. Several speakers referenced the recent death of Charles Faggart, who died in custody under controversial circumstances. They demanded transparency and accountability from the JSO, criticizing the council for perceived inaction and for prioritizing funding for law enforcement over community needs. One resident pointed out that a significant portion of the city’s budget—34%—is allocated to the JSO, questioning the effectiveness of this spending in improving community safety and welfare.

The proposed billion-dollar jail was another contentious topic. Many residents argued against the need for a new facility, suggesting that funds would be better spent on community services, infrastructure improvements, and mental health programs. They emphasized the importance of investing in preventative measures rather than expanding incarceration facilities.

Public engagement and the effectiveness of Community Planning Advisory Committees (CPACs) were also criticized. Speakers expressed frustration over feeling unheard in the planning process, calling for more meaningful citizen involvement and accountability from city officials.

The meeting concluded with a call for the council to reconsider its priorities, urging members to focus on community health, safety, and infrastructure rather than on projects perceived as benefiting developers and law enforcement at the expense of residents. The council's next steps remain to be seen as community members continue to advocate for their concerns to be addressed.