The Joint Legislative Ad Hoc Committee on Family Court Orders convened on May 12, 2025, to address pressing concerns regarding the family court system in Arizona. The meeting highlighted significant issues raised by individuals who have experienced systemic failures within the family law framework, particularly focusing on the financial and emotional toll on families.

One of the most impactful testimonies came from a father who described his harrowing experience navigating the family court system. He expressed frustration over the lack of focus on children's welfare in legal proceedings, stating that his minor child was often overlooked amidst extensive casework. The father detailed how his attempts to remain an active parent led to financial ruin, harassment, and emotional distress, emphasizing that the system should support parental involvement rather than undermine it.

He presented evidence of financial exploitation within the system, including exorbitant fees for counseling services and inflated income claims by the opposing party that resulted in unjust child support obligations. The father also raised concerns about the lack of accountability among court-appointed professionals, suggesting that some may benefit financially from prolonged legal disputes, thereby exacerbating the suffering of families involved.

Another speaker, Robert Del Garvino, echoed these sentiments, asserting that the family court system has been manipulated by certain psychologists and appointees for personal gain. He described a troubling pattern where these individuals exploit legal loopholes, creating additional challenges for families already in crisis. Del Garvino called for urgent reforms to address these systemic issues, emphasizing the need for accountability and transparency within the family court system.

The discussions during the meeting underscored a growing call for reform in Arizona's family court system, with advocates urging lawmakers to consider the evidence presented and take action to protect families from financial and emotional harm. As the committee continues its work, the testimonies serve as a stark reminder of the urgent need for change to ensure that the best interests of children and families are prioritized in legal proceedings.