Tampa Variance Board approves removal of tree for public safety improvements

On May 13, 2025, the City of Tampa's Variance Review Board convened to discuss a significant variance request concerning the removal of a grand tree located at the K Bar Segment G right of way. The meeting highlighted the delicate balance between environmental preservation and public safety, a theme that resonated throughout the discussions.

Tim Plate, an engineer with Height Design, presented the case for the tree's removal, emphasizing the environmental assessments conducted to evaluate the impact on the tree's root system. He explained that the proposed road construction would place the northern lanes dangerously close to the tree, potentially damaging its roots. In contrast, the plan to build two lanes on the southern side would still pose risks, as studies indicated that the tree's viability would be compromised regardless of the chosen route.

Cammie Corbett, representing the Eisenhower Property Group, echoed these concerns, stating that extensive efforts had been made to explore alternatives to tree removal, but none were viable. She underscored the city's commitment to preserving trees, noting that removal is considered a last resort.

The discussion took a critical turn when Nick Stocco, president of the Tampa Firefighters Union, voiced strong support for the variance. He highlighted the importance of the proposed roadway for emergency response times, particularly in the K Bar Ranch area, where delays in reaching residents could jeopardize lives. Stocco pointed out that the current response times could range from 12 to 15 minutes, which could be significantly improved with the new road configuration.

After hearing from various stakeholders, the board deliberated on the variance request. A motion was made to grant the request based on the evidence presented, which demonstrated that the tree's removal would enhance public safety and that alternative options would not suffice. The board unanimously approved the motion, emphasizing the necessity of prioritizing community safety over environmental concerns in this instance.

This meeting illustrates the ongoing challenges faced by urban planners and city officials as they navigate the complexities of development, environmental stewardship, and public safety. The decision to remove the tree, while difficult, reflects a commitment to ensuring that emergency services can operate effectively in growing neighborhoods. As Tampa continues to expand, similar discussions will likely arise, necessitating careful consideration of both ecological and community needs.