Sedgwick County considers new noise ordinance to address community complaints

In a recent Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners staff meeting, the ongoing issue of noise regulation was a focal point, highlighting the absence of a countywide noise ordinance. This discussion comes as complaints about noise in unincorporated areas continue to rise, particularly where county and city boundaries intersect, creating a clash of cultures regarding noise tolerance.

Armand Shekaif, the assistant county counselor, presented an overview of the current situation, noting that while specific sections of the county code address certain noise issues—such as continuous dog barking—there is no comprehensive ordinance to manage general noise complaints. This gap has led to a reliance on existing laws that are often inadequate for addressing the diverse noise-related challenges faced by residents.

Shekaif outlined two primary approaches used by other municipalities to tackle noise complaints: the use of mechanical instruments to measure decibel levels and a reasonableness standard that assesses noise based on community sensibilities. The latter approach, which has been upheld by the Kansas Supreme Court, is favored by many cities, including Wichita and Topeka, as it avoids the costs and complexities associated with noise measurement equipment.

The discussion revealed concerns among commissioners regarding the subjective nature of the reasonableness standard. Some expressed skepticism about its effectiveness, particularly in cases of short-duration noise events, such as fireworks or late-night gatherings. The challenge lies in establishing clear definitions and thresholds for what constitutes excessive noise, as well as ensuring that enforcement is practical and fair.

Commissioners also raised issues related to event centers operating in unincorporated areas, which have been a source of significant noise complaints. The conversation suggested a need for protective overlays or regulations to manage noise from these venues, especially during late-night events. However, there is caution about imposing regulations that could infringe on property rights or the freedoms of residents who enjoy activities like shooting or hosting gatherings.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that while the need for a noise ordinance is recognized, the path forward remains complex. The board is considering a countywide resolution that would incorporate the reasonableness standard, but the implications of such a move require careful deliberation. The commissioners acknowledged the importance of balancing community peace with individual freedoms, indicating that further discussions and potential public input will be necessary as they navigate this sensitive issue.