Rep Adams advocates for revised SNAP benefit formula to combat food insecurity

The U.S. House Committee on Agriculture convened on May 15, 2025, to discuss critical amendments related to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), with a focus on the integrity of the program and its impact on rural communities. The meeting highlighted the urgent need for reform as lawmakers grappled with proposed cuts that could significantly affect food security for millions of Americans.

Central to the discussions was an amendment proposed by Dr. Adams of North Carolina, which aimed to shift the calculation of SNAP benefits from the Thrifty Food Plan to the Low Cost Food Plan. Dr. Adams emphasized that the current average benefit of just $2 per meal is insufficient for families, veterans, seniors, and children. "You cannot be serious when you say you want to make America healthy again while proposing cuts to SNAP benefits," she stated, underscoring the contradiction in policy that could leave vulnerable populations hungry.

Despite her passionate plea, Dr. Adams ultimately withdrew her amendment, but not before urging her colleagues to consider the implications of inadequate funding for SNAP. Representative McGovern echoed her sentiments, pointing out that prior to the pandemic, the average SNAP benefit was only $1.40 per meal, a figure that has barely improved since. He criticized the proposed cuts, which he argued would disproportionately harm rural communities where food insecurity is already a pressing issue.

Another significant amendment discussed was introduced by Representative Takuda of Hawaii, which sought to protect rural communities from the adverse effects of SNAP cuts. Takuda highlighted that rural areas, including her own, face unique challenges such as high food prices and limited access to healthy options. "SNAP isn't just a safety net; it's economic infrastructure," she asserted, warning that cuts would lead to increased food insecurity and the collapse of local economies.

The committee also addressed concerns regarding veterans and military families, with Representative Scott advocating for an amendment to ensure that these groups would not lose their SNAP benefits. He described the amendment as a necessary safeguard for those who have served the country, stating, "Cutting SNAP benefits for even one veteran is an affront to our military community."

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the proposed cuts to SNAP could have far-reaching consequences, not only for individuals relying on the program but also for the broader economy. With over 27,000 retailers at risk of closing due to reduced SNAP funding, the potential for increased food deserts in rural areas loomed large.

The discussions concluded with a call for unity among lawmakers to protect SNAP and ensure that it continues to serve those in need. The committee's deliberations highlighted the critical intersection of food security, health, and economic stability, emphasizing that the fight against hunger is far from over. As lawmakers prepare for further negotiations, the fate of SNAP remains a pivotal issue that will impact millions of Americans across the country.