The Michigan House of Representatives held a meeting on May 14, 2025, focusing on oversight of corporate subsidies and state investments, particularly regarding the Goshen project in Big Rapids Township. The discussions highlighted significant financial allocations and community concerns surrounding the project.
During the meeting, it was revealed that Goshen has received funding from three main incentive programs: the Strategic Site Readiness Program (SSRP), the Community Investment Program (CIP), and the Renaissance Zone. The SSRP has allocated $125 million, but no funds have been disbursed yet as the company has not met required milestones. Additionally, $50 million was designated for site development, with approximately $23.7 million already allocated. The Renaissance Zone offers tax incentives, but no value has been triggered as the company has yet to begin its investment.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free The permitting process for Goshen remains uncertain, with the company reportedly waiting for court proceedings to conclude. Questions arose regarding the lack of a Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) report, which was a point of contention for local leaders. The CFIUS review assesses potential national security risks, and it was noted that the property did not meet the criteria for such a review.
Community engagement has been a significant aspect of the project, with initial public meetings seeing low attendance. However, as concerns grew, particularly regarding environmental impacts and the project's ties to China, attendance surged. The dialogue shifted from standard community concerns to heightened scrutiny, especially in early 2023.
The meeting also touched on the division within the community regarding support for the Goshen project. Surveys indicated a split in public opinion, with some representatives suggesting that a "silent majority" supported the project, while others pointed to evidence of significant opposition.
Overall, the meeting underscored the complexities of economic development initiatives in Michigan, balancing state investment with community sentiment and regulatory requirements. The discussions will likely influence future decisions regarding corporate subsidies and the state's approach to economic development.