The Michigan Legislature's Subcommittee on Homeland Security and Foreign Influence convened on May 14, 2025, to discuss critical issues surrounding drone technology and its implications for national security and public safety. A significant focus of the meeting was the ongoing concerns regarding the use of foreign-manufactured drones, particularly those from companies like DJI, in sensitive areas such as Department of Defense (DOD) facilities.
During the session, Vice Chair Meerman raised questions about the balance between utilizing drone technology for public safety and the potential risks associated with foreign-made equipment. The discussion highlighted the need for strict standards when operating drones near critical infrastructure, emphasizing that public safety responders often rely on data that is publicly accessible. However, the conversation also acknowledged the inherent risks of using drones that may not be manufactured in the United States.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free A key point of contention was the cybersecurity standards applied to U.S. manufacturers. Concerns were raised about a recent incident involving Skydio, a U.S. drone manufacturer, which sent out promotional materials that inadvertently captured sensitive video data. This incident underscored the necessity for robust cybersecurity measures across all manufacturers, regardless of their origin.
The subcommittee also discussed the federal government's upcoming audit of DJI, Autel, and Angi Robotics, mandated under the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for 2025. The results of these audits, expected by the end of the year, could lead to significant regulatory changes, including potential bans on these companies if any security issues are identified. Until the audit findings are released, the subcommittee expressed caution against preemptively regulating drone technology.
Additionally, concerns were raised about the potential for foreign entities to disable drones during conflicts, particularly with nations like China. However, representatives from consulting firms assured the committee that studies have shown no backdoor access in these drones when operated in local data mode with U.S.-based software.
In conclusion, the meeting underscored the complexities of integrating drone technology into public safety operations while addressing national security concerns. The subcommittee's next steps will depend heavily on the outcomes of the federal audits, which could reshape the landscape of drone usage in Michigan and beyond.