City Council discusses tiny homes zoning and building standard reductions

In the heart of Kalispell's city hall, a spirited discussion unfolded during the recent Planning Commission meeting, where members grappled with the future of housing and community design. As the clock ticked on May 13, 2025, the commission explored various proposals aimed at addressing the pressing need for affordable housing while balancing community aesthetics and regulations.

One of the most contentious topics was the proposal to reduce lot sizes for new developments. A commission member expressed skepticism, noting that the financial viability of smaller lots often does not align with construction costs. "The price per square foot does not equate," they remarked, highlighting concerns that such changes might not yield the desired increase in housing availability. Despite this, the discussion revealed a trend toward smaller lot sizes in recent developments, suggesting a shift in community standards over the past few decades.

The meeting also touched on the controversial idea of reducing aesthetic and design standards for apartment buildings. This proposal received the least support from the community, with members questioning how to measure the impact of such reductions. "You can't just tell the architect to make it look half as good," one member quipped, underscoring the challenges of maintaining quality while pursuing affordability.

Another significant point of discussion was the potential inclusion of tiny homes in the city’s housing strategy. Defined as homes under 400 square feet, tiny houses garnered a surprisingly positive response from the community, tying for the third highest level of support. While zoning regulations currently allow for such homes, the commission acknowledged the practical challenges of integrating them into existing neighborhoods, particularly concerning utility costs and land use.

The conversation also ventured into the complexities of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and their relationship with tiny homes. Members clarified that while zoning permits one tiny home per property, the addition of an ADU complicates the landscape, raising questions about parking and space utilization.

As the meeting progressed, the commission examined the implications of reducing building setback requirements. This proposal faced lukewarm support, with concerns about maintaining adequate space between homes for access and maintenance. "At some point, you gotta have usable space," one member emphasized, reflecting the delicate balance between density and livability.

In conclusion, the Planning Commission's discussions highlighted the intricate dance between innovation in housing solutions and the preservation of community character. As Kalispell navigates these challenges, the outcomes of these proposals could significantly shape the city’s landscape, making it a pivotal moment for residents and planners alike. The commission's next steps will be crucial in determining how Kalispell adapts to the evolving needs of its community while honoring its unique identity.