Charleston activists urge city council to repeal First Amendment restrictions on protests

In a charged atmosphere at the Charleston City Council meeting on May 13, 2025, community members passionately voiced their concerns over the city's controversial First Amendment demonstration ordinance. The ordinance, enacted in 2021, has faced increasing scrutiny as residents argue it infringes on their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly.

The meeting began with a representative from a national organization advocating for peaceful protests, who expressed frustration over the denial of a permit for a planned demonstration on June 14. The group had anticipated 1,600 attendees but was told they needed to navigate a lengthy special events permitting process. This sentiment echoed throughout the evening, as multiple speakers called for the repeal of the ordinance, citing its perceived bias and arbitrary enforcement.

Daniel Knapp, one of the speakers, highlighted the ordinance's implications for political expression, suggesting that its enforcement has become politically charged. He urged the council to reconsider its stance to avoid potential legal challenges from organizations like the ACLU, which are reportedly preparing to take action against the city.

Josh Dix, representing the Real Estate Association, took a different approach, thanking the council for recognizing a local leader while also encouraging ongoing discussions about land use and development. However, the majority of speakers focused on the ordinance, with many recounting personal experiences of intimidation during peaceful protests.

One speaker, who identified as a veteran, shared a poignant reflection on the importance of free speech, emphasizing that discomfort should not dictate the right to protest. This theme resonated with others who argued that the ordinance stifles vital community voices, particularly those advocating for marginalized groups.

As the meeting progressed, the call for repeal intensified. Residents expressed that the ordinance was a direct response to community outrage over police violence, particularly following the death of Jamal Sutherland. They argued that it has only served to suppress dissent and protect those in power rather than ensure public safety.

The council also received numerous online comments, with a significant number opposing the ordinance and calling for its repeal. The overwhelming sentiment among speakers was clear: the community seeks to reclaim their rights to assemble and express their views without fear of retribution.

As the meeting concluded, the council was left to grapple with the weight of these voices, reflecting a community at a crossroads, eager for change and committed to upholding the principles of democracy. The future of the First Amendment demonstration ordinance remains uncertain, but the passionate pleas from residents signal a growing movement for reform in Charleston.