Wildlife rehabilitators accuse Michigan DNR of harassment and improper inspections

In a tense and revealing session at the Michigan Legislature, a wildlife rehabilitation expert shared her harrowing experiences with state enforcement agencies, shedding light on what she described as the "weaponization" of state government against her facility. The meeting, held on May 14, 2025, brought to the forefront serious allegations of overreach and intimidation by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR).

The testimony began with a shocking account of a poaching incident on the expert's property, where a doe was found shot during archery season, a time when hunting regulations were strictly enforced. Despite her immediate report to Officer Kiel, the response was delayed, leading to frustration as the deer carcass was left to be consumed by wildlife. When a DNR officer finally arrived days later, the situation escalated. Instead of focusing on the poaching, the officer recorded video footage of fawns on the property, which was later used against her in court, raising questions about the agency's motives.

The expert expressed disbelief at the DNR's actions, stating, "We call this government agency for help with a violation of poaching, and they're here on their own agenda trying to find hidden issues to revoke my permit." This sentiment resonated throughout the meeting, as she recounted further incidents involving armed officers conducting unwarranted inspections, creating an atmosphere of fear among volunteers and staff at her facility.

One particularly alarming episode involved a three-hour search of her property triggered by a social media post about animal rescue efforts. The DNR's response, which included armed officers, was described as excessive and intimidating, especially for elderly volunteers who were simply trying to help animals in need. The expert recounted how Officer Kiel stood too close for comfort, hand on his weapon, creating an environment of intimidation rather than support.

As the meeting progressed, the expert highlighted a lack of understanding among DNR officials regarding wildlife rehabilitation standards. She pointed out that the agency's enforcement actions often stemmed from misunderstandings of established practices, such as "soft release" methods for rehabilitating animals. Despite having the backing of national wildlife rehabilitation standards, she faced charges that seemed to stem from a fundamental misinterpretation of her work.

The session concluded with a call for accountability and a reevaluation of how state agencies interact with wildlife rehabilitators. The expert's testimony painted a picture of a system in need of reform, where the very agencies meant to protect wildlife and support rehabilitation efforts instead wield their authority in ways that threaten the livelihoods of those dedicated to animal care. As the meeting wrapped up, it left attendees pondering the implications of such government actions on wildlife conservation and community trust.