Michigan animal rehabber Kelly Labonte fights state charges after years of disputes

The Michigan Legislature convened on May 14, 2025, to address ongoing concerns regarding the oversight and alleged weaponization of state government against wildlife rehabilitator Kelly Labonte. The meeting featured testimonies from Labonte and her supporters, highlighting a protracted legal battle that has spanned nearly seven years.

The session began with Labonte's attorney presenting evidence of what they described as frivolous charges against her, including accusations related to the size of animal enclosures and procedural violations regarding permit submissions. Labonte's attorney emphasized that the charges, which number around 14, are largely baseless and stem from a personal vendetta rather than legitimate concerns for animal welfare. Labonte herself noted that she had been charged for using a computer spreadsheet for her annual permit instead of a handwritten form, which she argued was an unreasonable expectation.

Supporters of Labonte, including Shira Christiansen from the Detroit Animal Welfare Group, voiced their frustrations over the financial and emotional toll the case has taken on Labonte. They reported that nearly half a million dollars has been spent on legal fees and related costs, disrupting her ability to care for animals and maintain her livelihood. Christiansen described the intimidation tactics employed by state officers, including their presence outside Labonte's home, which has created a climate of fear and uncertainty.

The discussion also touched on the treatment of animals under the jurisdiction of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR). Labonte's supporters criticized the DNR's handling of wildlife, particularly in cases where animals were found in distress. They recounted instances where the DNR allegedly allowed animals to suffer rather than intervening, raising ethical questions about the agency's priorities.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that Labonte's case is emblematic of broader issues regarding state oversight and the treatment of wildlife rehabilitators in Michigan. The attorney representing Labonte indicated that they are prepared to escalate their legal efforts, potentially pursuing federal action if necessary. The meeting concluded with a call for continued support for Labonte and a plea for the legislature to reconsider the actions of the DNR in light of the evidence presented.

Overall, the session underscored the tensions between state regulatory bodies and wildlife rehabilitators, raising significant questions about the balance of power and the implications for animal welfare in Michigan. The next steps in Labonte's legal battle remain uncertain, but her supporters are committed to advocating for her rights and the welfare of the animals she cares for.