In a heated Michigan Legislature meeting on May 14, 2025, lawmakers confronted the troubling allegations of state government overreach and intimidation tactics employed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) against wildlife rehabilitator Dr. Kelly LeBonte. The session revealed a pattern of alleged harassment that has persisted for seven years, raising serious concerns about the DNR's practices and accountability.
Representative Schreiber expressed outrage over the situation, describing it as "terrorization" and highlighting the financial burden placed on Dr. LeBonte, who has reportedly spent over $150,000 defending herself against the DNR's actions. The discussion centered on whether there is a path for financial reconciliation for Dr. LeBonte, who has faced legal challenges while trying to care for injured wildlife.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Dr. LeBonte's attorney indicated that the DNR's aggressive stance may stem from her public criticism of their policies, suggesting that her legal troubles are a direct result of her advocacy for animal welfare. The meeting also touched on specific incidents, including reports of DNR agents arriving at her property in a threatening manner, which were described as intimidation tactics.
Lawmakers questioned the DNR's internal processes, particularly regarding wildlife rehabilitation permits, and whether recent policy changes were made to justify the charges against Dr. LeBonte. The conversation underscored a broader concern about the balance of power between state agencies and individuals advocating for animal rights.
As the meeting concluded, the urgency for reform and accountability within the DNR was palpable, with representatives calling for a reassessment of how the agency interacts with wildlife rehabilitators. The implications of this case extend beyond Dr. LeBonte, raising critical questions about the treatment of individuals who challenge state authority in the name of public service and animal welfare.