Exonerees and advocates criticize Senate Bill 490's impact on compensation rights

In a poignant gathering at the California Victim Compensation Board meeting on May 15, 2025, the voices of exonerees echoed through the room, shedding light on the critical implications of Senate Bill 490. The bill, which proposes significant changes to the compensation process for wrongfully convicted individuals, has sparked deep concern among advocates and those directly affected by wrongful convictions.

Karen Sinoontowery, a retired attorney and volunteer with the Northern California Innocence Project, opened the discussion by emphasizing the board's vital role in ensuring justice for exonerees. She expressed alarm over SB 490's potential to undermine the rights of those wrongfully convicted, particularly its provision allowing prosecutors to contest compensation claims based solely on trial records, disregarding new evidence that may exonerate individuals. "If the prosecution can ignore post-conviction evidence, it would victimize exonerees who have lost years of their lives," she warned.

Kimberly Long, an exoneree who spent over seven years in prison for a crime she did not commit, shared her harrowing experience. She highlighted how the trial record was filled with flawed information that could have denied her the compensation necessary to rebuild her life. "If the state had been allowed to rely solely on the trial record, I never would have had a chance," she stated, urging the board to consider the broader implications of the bill on future exonerees.

Stephan Patterson, another exoneree, echoed these sentiments, reflecting on the challenges faced by those released from prison without job skills or support. He urged the board to recognize the urgency of providing timely compensation to help exonerees reintegrate into society. "To wait any longer to get what we rightfully deserve is harsh," he said, emphasizing the need for compassion and understanding.

Jeremy Puckett, who spent nearly two decades in prison, raised concerns about the board's perceived neutrality, questioning its advocacy for SB 490 while also being responsible for processing compensation claims. He expressed a deep sense of responsibility to advocate for those still waiting for justice, stating, "It hurts to think that their path of healing may be hindered by decisions made behind the scenes."

Todd Frias, executive director of the Northern California Innocence Project, criticized the board's use of past claimants as cautionary tales to justify changes in the law. He argued that this approach undermines the dignity of exonerees and distorts the mission of the board, which should focus on serving those harmed by the legal system.

Jasmine Harris, director of policy at the Innocence Center, called for action to rebuild trust between the board and exonerees. She highlighted the lack of visibility and resources dedicated to wrongful conviction claims, urging the board to clarify its legislative advocacy process and ensure that exonerees are recognized and supported.

As the meeting concluded, the testimonies of these exonerees painted a vivid picture of the struggles faced by individuals wrongfully convicted. Their calls for justice and compassion resonate deeply, reminding us of the importance of a fair and equitable system that honors the dignity of all individuals, especially those who have suffered the profound injustice of wrongful conviction. The future of SB 490 remains uncertain, but the voices of those affected will continue to advocate for a system that truly serves justice.