The Henrico County Board of Supervisors held a Special Joint Meeting on May 15, 2025, to discuss proposed restrictions on data center developments, particularly focusing on the White Oak Tech Park. The meeting aimed to address community concerns regarding the rapid growth of data centers and their potential impacts on local resources and quality of life.
The discussion began with a clarification from a board member about the intent behind the proposed restrictions. The aim is to limit the automatic development rights currently enjoyed by data centers, requiring them to obtain a provisional use permit (PUP) for any new projects. This change would allow for public hearings and input on each proposal, ensuring that community voices are heard in the decision-making process.
Before you scroll further...
Get access to the words and decisions of your elected officials for free!
Subscribe for Free Several residents voiced their opinions during the public comment period. Michael O'Brien, a local resident, acknowledged the need for restrictions but questioned why the zoning code could not be changed entirely instead of creating an overlay. He emphasized that the proposed changes would affect only a small percentage of existing developments and highlighted the significant investments made by local homeowners compared to those in the data center industry.
Concerns about environmental impacts were also raised. O'Brien pointed out the lack of air quality monitoring in the area and called for baseline assessments to understand the potential effects of data centers on local air quality. Other speakers echoed these sentiments, urging the board to consider the environmental implications of data center operations, particularly regarding water usage and pollution.
Andy Common, a former Henrico County employee, expressed concerns about the rushed nature of the ordinance process, noting that the public had only two weeks to review the proposed changes. He advocated for a deferral to allow for more thorough community engagement and discussion, suggesting that the ordinance could have unintended consequences if rushed.
Residents also questioned how the revenue generated from data centers would benefit the community. Many expressed skepticism about whether the financial gains would translate into tangible improvements for local residents, such as tax reductions or environmental protections.
The meeting concluded with a recognition of the need for ongoing dialogue between the board, the planning commission, and the community. Board members acknowledged the importance of balancing development with community needs and environmental sustainability. The board is expected to continue discussions on the proposed restrictions and consider the feedback received from residents before making a final decision.