Traffic study reveals imminent congestion risks at Exit 22 and Dike Access Road

In a recent Planning Commission meeting held in Woodland, Washington, city officials and community members gathered to discuss pressing transportation issues, particularly focusing on the traffic dynamics at Exit 21 and Exit 22 of Interstate 5. As the meeting unfolded, the conversation highlighted the anticipated surge in traffic due to the development of the industrial district, raising concerns about the current infrastructure's capacity to handle increased volumes.

The discussion revealed that the current capacity at Dike Access East, associated with Exit 22, is already nearing its limits. With a current volume of 585 vehicles during peak hours, projections indicate that this could escalate to over 1,070 trips if the industrial area fully develops. This shift would dramatically alter the level of service from a manageable B to a concerning D, indicating significant congestion and potential delays for drivers.

Participants in the meeting expressed their concerns about where this increased traffic would be directed. Many vehicles are expected to navigate towards Sherman Way and Walmart, which are located west of I-5. However, the conversation also touched on the routes that drivers might take to avoid congestion, including alternative paths through local neighborhoods and roundabouts.

The roundabouts, while designed to facilitate smoother traffic flow, were noted to have their limitations. As vehicles from both directions converge, the stacking of cars can lead to delays, regardless of whether they are heading east or west. The officials discussed potential solutions, such as expanding the number of lanes on off-ramps and enhancing the roundabouts to better accommodate the growing traffic.

Moreover, the meeting underscored the importance of integrating findings from comprehensive traffic studies into the city’s planning efforts. These studies provide valuable insights into traffic patterns and can guide future infrastructure improvements. However, there was a shared sentiment that many of these plans often remain overlooked, leading to missed opportunities for proactive development.

As the meeting concluded, it became clear that Woodland faces a critical juncture in managing its transportation infrastructure. With the industrial district on the horizon, city planners and residents alike are left contemplating how best to prepare for the inevitable changes in traffic flow and ensure that the community remains accessible and efficient for all its residents. The discussions at the Planning Commission serve as a reminder of the ongoing need for thoughtful urban planning in the face of growth and change.