[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6236611,"mediaKeyId","3355814-69ec069ae58792e953cb3f30c442c21d","parentId",3355814,"title","Planning board reviews communications: volunteer joins conservation land talks, board urges wider notice for cell‑tower balloon tests","audioSeconds",575,"startMs",325000,"endMs",900000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=3355814-69ec069ae58792e953cb3f30c442c21d&start=325&end=900","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3355814-69ec069ae58792e953cb3f30c442c21d/thumbnail_325000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6236611/Plymouth/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Planning-board-reviews-communications-volunteer-joins-conservation-land-talks-board-urges-wider-notice-for-celltower-balloon-tests","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6236611-58415e2a8553f3beaf4623ac4631495f/orig.mp4?Expires=1774515684&Signature=TuLtmNGg5LMLGB9BhuBtDk-x3qgztMLWE6rXYY4VWnluPygacZWkhf1exEJSq4aK3q5W3LTU5ah2RQC4skEFjJLH~sTEyuVksMruLNz1suK-aTmsl78nqbjhdTStcVUtVjKrgfRD~va1QJhyTbN~4TwgEuRCMAbYtZa7riOYW40Pkf0aFBUu769k-xP8p4Ugbq2c4ELPINj2ueGS4R~meBXGdqkxCiejDArBc5cVu8FJvqN3cQmOPCIb4H1qLRXPjGJCGhLjZdhTA3ax5vIQSONodbMiOIt9iNMITayHIYMRd~4qQtG4Bh8QmFJDjt3muihL5YWaiwV9tEquJkwApA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Plymouth, NH","date","2025-05-16T17:22:12Z","article","During the communications portion of its meeting the Plymouth Planning Board reviewed several letters and notices received since its last meeting and took nonbinding steps on two items: a volunteer appointment to an informal conservation‑lands discussion group and a recommendation to better publicize short‑term cell‑tower balloon tests.

Grace Garvey of the town’s Energy Commission invited a planning board designee to participate in an informal group working with the Lakes Region Conservation Trust to explore potential conservation lands near Plymouth. Neil (board member) offered to serve and Joseph (planning staff) said he would connect Neil with Garvey and provide meeting details. Neil said simply, “I’ll do it.” Joseph said the next meeting was May 20 at 5 p.m., and that the group is informal and not a chartered town committee.

Separately, staff noted a recent balloon‑test notice for a proposed cell tower off 16 Cadillac Lane in Sanbornton. Board members discussed the short duration of balloon tests (often a few hours) and the limited notice practices; they recommended the town consider posting timely notices on the town website and a Facebook announcement in addition to the newspaper of general circulation so residents can see and assess visual impacts while a balloon is airborne. Joseph explained these tests often accompany courtesy notifications for visual impact but do not replace the formal planning or permitting process.

The board also briefly reviewed the town’s social media policy, adopted April 28, and encouraged any questions be directed to the select board or to Scott Wheaton (town contact). Mary Anne Barnsley’s letter regarding historic parking research and support for the Tenney Mountain Overlay District was acknowledged; board members said the town should weigh that local business and select‑board perspective in future downtown parking work.

The actions taken were informal: the board accepted correspondence into the record, supported staff posting timely balloon‑test notices, and agreed that Joseph should pass contact information to Grace Garvey for the conservation discussion group. No formal committee appointments or regulatory changes were made during the meeting on these items.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Plymouth Planning Board - 5/15/25","oneSentenceSummary","The board reviewed recent communications: a member volunteered to join an informal conservation‑lands group coordinated by the Lakes Region Conservation Trust; the board discussed posting timely notices for short‑duration cell‑tower balloon tests and reviewed a town social media policy adopted April 28.","taxTitle","Plymouth, Grafton County, New Hampshire","taxId",61623,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6236616,"Mountain Village Charter School pauses planned campus; Plymouth board will let conditional approval lapse",160,3869000,4029000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3355814-69ec069ae58792e953cb3f30c442c21d&start=3869&end=4029","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3355814-69ec069ae58792e953cb3f30c442c21d/thumbnail_3869000.jpg","/articles/6236616/Plymouth/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Mountain-Village-Charter-School-pauses-planned-campus-Plymouth-board-will-let-conditional-approval-lapse","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6236616-5e285335ca198fb1817df772f3910397/orig.mp4?Expires=1774515684&Signature=kHR2QUqBdHvg8SjzKgUcIQ5oIOwSJH-Ko0Z698oYV4J-MbQMqTq-JGjwZjdZYZ6lWplXMdU~gtPN3d1Je7oPSXHXIRWyBknXaxD8Fg08BN1j9k9A2rsnZFATQrQI~jVy9o3pstFjXGOplprdwgyk6Nkt4sWC93N8~YCNWthe9Bvki5NXThLSz0tEGpqumviPcKE00OdWEowJazxS6-p22MK~8AEfxIvLHpME~igGLObpe-zZXW2ICwbPI3717GMSXWWEb~hBSxlNJiHKi1-vZDbUwUWIwk8KS7m4sFsNgkXAIjW8dNaC80W-0-KSjxNht4Dyvac2hfEFmwnH437Gwg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Mountain Village Charter School told the Plymouth Planning Board it cannot commit to starting construction on its conditionally approved campus within the required timeframe because of financial constraints, and the board agreed to let the approval lapse unless the applicant returns with revised plans.

Joseph (planning staff) summarized the board’s prior conditional approval of the project on Jan. 18, 2024, and the subsequent one‑year extension the board granted to meet conditions. The approval required changes including a separated pedestrian walkway, walkway lighting and other conditions the board set before construction could begin.

In a written communication read by staff, Delaney Carrier, vice president of the board of Mountain Village Charter School, said: “We at MVCS appreciate the patience … Unfortunately, we have concluded that at this time, we cannot commit to beginning construction within the time frame of the current site plan conditional approval due to our financial constraints versus the ever increasing costs of construction.” Carrier added the school is “continuing with plans to move to a new campus, and are exploring options, including purchase or lease of a different property, or modifying the current build plans.”

Joseph advised the board the school had not submitted the revised plans the board required for compliance and recommended letting the conditional approval expire; under the town’s site‑plan review regulations applicants have one year to meet conditions and two years to begin active, substantial development. Board members said they wished the school well and voted to let the approval run out; the extension currently on the file will expire on Jan. 18, 2026, after which the prior conditional approval would lapse unless the applicant reopens the matter.

The board had previously approved a conditional permit for a multibuilding educational facility with conditions; staff noted Mountain Village had come back several times for continuations of the compliance hearing without providing the required revised plans. The board’s action was procedural: it did not rescind the earlier approval but decided not to continue the compliance hearing and to allow the time limit to run so the applicant may return with a new application if circumstances change.","Mountain Village Charter School told the Plymouth Planning Board it cannot commit to beginning construction under its conditional approval because of financial constraints; the planning board voted to let the conditional approval expire and to renotice new hearings if the school returns with new plans.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6236621,"Plymouth planning board conditionally approves Walmart expansion, signs master plan with changes",2813,935000,3748000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=3355814-69ec069ae58792e953cb3f30c442c21d&start=935&end=3748","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/3355814-69ec069ae58792e953cb3f30c442c21d/thumbnail_935000.jpg","/articles/6236621/Plymouth/Grafton-County/New-Hampshire/Plymouth-planning-board-conditionally-approves-Walmart-expansion-signs-master-plan-with-changes","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6236621-267587148da71f1dd01def59bd35c1ab/orig.mp4?Expires=1774515684&Signature=d1kdDdrbUk0cxdDnxqPa2Wo-kulVa6HJfMjZiLT9uE6y~RJYNEmKpUnxJd0uyUABZ-SU7kdq9lsX5VX9YfHQcvQ8kmhXccNohkzAL~ZexUbyiSde6Yyis54Hv16XkfQEkpn2ER2XhhIz0dRFp3t5eKhKUOTd5X77UL6NmK0xiHBxTZ5SMebkuaNJPmVx8cniX62M-rOXNS9o1pxizD51MnzLwnCfpSqCFpCsOD5zcuhkhpVuBJwy5AF5QZoNCbbFOWra2FXwc4uEfE0bToi7pnJ-f8Eh2d10lDKfoyuy5OPCYIVNKDxwLq2WqjOkDNMtbVOHc88s9kcQJaPkkw9F9A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Plymouth Planning Board on an evening meeting accepted and conditionally approved a site plan for the Walmart store on Tenney Mountain Highway that adds approximately 2,181 square feet and reconfigures parking and pickup circulation.

The board said the expansion would preserve required setbacks and parking, and it accepted a master sign plan for the property after directing the applicant to remove three wayfinding signs and provide a final signage layout. The approval is conditional on the applicant signing a development agreement, placing funds in escrow for construction inspection and submitting any necessary permits before starting work.

Justin Latier, the applicant’s representative with Colliers Engineering Design, told the board the pickup expansion — an “OPD” improvement — is intended to “improve operations at the stores” and accommodate grocery and in‑store pickup. He said the work includes an interior remodel and facade updates intended to “future‑proof the site” and improve safety for customers and staff.

Board staff said the project will not increase the site’s impervious area and that stormwater routing will continue to the existing drainage outfall after modest conduit changes. Joseph (planning staff) noted the applicant obtained a State of New Hampshire Department of Transportation driveway permit at DOT’s request even though the work does not alter the public right‑of‑way.

On signage, the board discussed distinguishing wayfinding/directional signs from advertising and acknowledged the zoning table for the ICD zone limits properties to one freestanding sign unless the planning board approves a master sign plan. The board accepted the applicant’s designation that the submitted materials will serve as a master sign plan, but it required a revised plan showing the final sign locations and sizes. The plans show directional signs sized 18 by 24 inches and pickup posts composed of stacked panels (18x18, 18x8 and 18x36); a larger light‑pole banner is shown at 24 by 60 inches.

The board approved three waivers the applicant requested related to water and sewer provisions not applicable where municipal water and sewer already serve the site. The board also asked the applicant to confirm geotechnical findings for foundation work and to provide final engineering for minor relocated stormlines that conflicted with the proposed expansion.

Conditions of approval require: execution of a development agreement; escrowed funds for construction inspection; submission of revised plans showing final sign locations and details; and receipt of all applicable permits before beginning on‑site construction. The applicant indicated a roughly four‑month construction window and does not anticipate construction beginning until 2026.

The planning board held a public hearing on the project; no members of the public attended the hearing in person or online. With the stated conditions the board voted to accept the application as complete, approve the master sign plan as revised, and grant conditional site‑plan approval.

Documentation the board requested for the file includes the geotechnical report, the final signed DOT driveway permit, the updated sign plan, and the executed development agreement and escrow arrangements.","The Plymouth Planning Board accepted a Walmart site plan to add roughly 2,181 square feet, approved a master sign plan after removing three wayfinding signs, and gave conditional site-plan approval with requirements including a development agreement, inspection escrow and final signage details.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning board reviews communications: volunteer joins conservation land talks, board urges wider notice for cell‑tower balloon tests

Mountain Village Charter School pauses planned campus; Plymouth board will let conditional approval lapse

Plymouth planning board conditionally approves Walmart expansion, signs master plan with changes