Town Council debates technology allowance for officials amid budget considerations

During the recent Board of Commissioners meeting in Matthews, Union County, discussions centered around the contentious issue of technology allowances for elected officials. The meeting, held on May 19, 2025, revealed a divide among commissioners regarding the necessity and appropriateness of providing financial support for technology needs.

The conversation began with a review of the current technology allowance, which stands at $3,600 per term. Some commissioners expressed concerns about the fairness and practicality of this allowance, suggesting that it may not be necessary for all members. There was a proposal to lower the allowance to $2,000 per term, which would still provide support for those who need it while addressing concerns about excessive spending.

Commissioner Higdon defended the technology allowance, stating that many constituents appreciate the work done by commissioners and the communication enabled by technology. He emphasized that using the allowance is part of the compensation for the role and should not be a source of shame for those who utilize it.

Conversely, other commissioners argued for a more structured approach, suggesting that the town should provide necessary equipment directly rather than offering a monetary allowance. This would eliminate any perception of impropriety and ensure that all commissioners have access to the tools they need without the optics of a financial benefit.

The discussion also touched on the types of technology that should be covered under the allowance, with suggestions to limit it to essential items like computers and related software. This would help prevent misuse of funds for non-essential purchases.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the board would need to revisit the policy surrounding technology allowances. The outcome of these discussions will likely impact how commissioners are equipped to serve their constituents effectively while addressing public concerns about spending and transparency. The board plans to continue this conversation in future meetings, aiming to reach a consensus that balances support for elected officials with fiscal responsibility.