California voters uphold Proposition 209 ensuring non-discrimination in public sectors

The U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce convened on May 21, 2025, to discuss the implications of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies, particularly in the context of higher education. The meeting highlighted a significant disconnect between public sentiment and legislative actions regarding racial preferences in university admissions.

The session began with a witness from California discussing the state's historical commitment to equality before the law, referencing Proposition 209, which was passed by voters in 1996. This proposition enshrined the principles of nondiscrimination in public employment, education, and contracting. The witness noted that despite a legislative push in 2020 to overturn these principles, California voters decisively rejected the repeal, maintaining their commitment to equality with a vote of 57.2% against the proposed change.

The discussion then shifted to broader public opinion on DEI policies. Research presented during the meeting indicated that a majority of Americans, across various racial groups, oppose the use of racial preferences in university admissions. This sentiment was echoed by a witness who cited polling data from Gallup and Pew Research Center, which consistently show that Americans, including Asian, white, Latino, and Black individuals, largely disapprove of considering race in admissions processes.

The witness emphasized the growing disconnect between the views of the general public and those of political and educational elites, suggesting that grassroots movements are increasingly advocating for policies that align with the principles of equality and nondiscrimination. The meeting concluded with a call to reaffirm these foundational principles, highlighting a moment of potential change in public policy.

Overall, the committee's discussions underscored a significant tension between legislative actions and public opinion regarding DEI initiatives, suggesting a potential shift in future policy directions as lawmakers respond to the will of the people.