Critics slam proposed budget cuts to DOE energy efficiency and science programs

During a recent subcommittee hearing, the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations scrutinized the President's Fiscal Year 2026 budget request for the Department of Energy (DOE), revealing significant concerns about proposed cuts to critical energy programs. The discussions highlighted a staggering $71 billion in private investment cancellations and delays in energy projects this year, raising alarms as electric prices soar to record highs.

One of the most pressing issues raised was the proposed $20 billion reduction in the non-defense sector of the DOE's budget. This includes a drastic 75% cut to the energy efficiency and renewable energy program, which many argue is essential for reducing energy costs for consumers. Critics of the budget expressed disbelief at the notion that Americans would prefer higher electric bills, questioning the rationale behind such severe cuts to programs designed to foster innovation and energy independence.

The hearing also addressed the potential consequences of these budget cuts, particularly the impact on jobs and technological advancements. The proposed budget would eliminate funding for key initiatives established under the bipartisan infrastructure law, including hydrogen hubs and battery storage projects. Lawmakers warned that these reductions could lead to a loss of manufacturing jobs and a decline in the U.S. position in the global energy market, particularly as countries like China advance in critical technologies.

Additionally, concerns were raised about the flat funding for the Hanford cleanup project, which is crucial for addressing high-level waste. Stakeholders noted that maintaining current funding levels could hinder progress and force reallocations from other essential projects, ultimately delaying remediation efforts that affect the Columbia River.

As the hearing concluded, it became clear that the proposed budget cuts could have far-reaching implications for energy costs, job creation, and environmental remediation efforts. Lawmakers emphasized the need for real investments in energy infrastructure and innovation, urging the administration to reconsider its approach to ensure a sustainable and economically viable energy future for the nation.