Residents voice concerns over traffic and drainage at Garmin Road development meeting

In a recent meeting of the Development Waiver Review Committee in Paulding County, community members voiced their concerns about a proposed housing development that could significantly alter the character of their neighborhood. The meeting, held on May 20, 2025, drew residents who have lived in the area for decades, eager to express their apprehensions about increased traffic and potential impacts on property values.

Cheryl Reed's husband, a long-time resident of Garmin Road, raised critical questions about the development's traffic implications. He noted the current congestion on Garmin, where he observed a steady stream of vehicles during peak hours. "We’re not looking for more congestion," he stated, highlighting the need for turn lanes and safe access points to the new development. His concerns echoed throughout the meeting, as other residents shared similar sentiments about the potential for increased traffic on already busy roads.

Aldi Patterson, another concerned neighbor, expressed worries about the development's impact on property values and drainage issues. "It's just too much, too close," she lamented, emphasizing the desire to maintain the quiet nature of their neighborhood. Patterson's opposition reflected a broader sentiment among residents who fear that the influx of new homes could disrupt their community's tranquility.

As the committee addressed these concerns, they sought clarity from the developers regarding the number of driveways and access points planned for the new homes. The developers confirmed there would be a total of seven driveway entrances for 20 lots, a figure that raised eyebrows among residents who questioned whether this would be sufficient to manage the expected traffic.

The committee also discussed technical aspects of the development, including fire access road requirements and the overall layout of the proposed homes. While some residents remained hopeful for a balanced solution, the meeting underscored the tension between development and community preservation.

As the public hearing concluded, the committee promised to seek answers to the residents' questions and concerns, leaving the door open for further discussions. The outcome of this development proposal remains uncertain, but the voices of the community have made it clear that they are watching closely, advocating for their neighborhood's future.