Grand Junction residents urge city council to reconsider Fourth and Fifth Street changes

The Grand Junction City Council held a regular meeting on May 21, 2025, where significant discussions centered around the recent changes to Fourth and Fifth Streets, particularly the pilot project aimed at enhancing safety for pedestrians and cyclists. The meeting featured a series of public comments reflecting a divided community regarding the project's impact.

The session began with a call for transparency and accountability from council members, with some residents expressing disappointment over perceived double standards in addressing public concerns. A notable point raised was the inconsistency in responses to business boycotts related to infrastructure changes, highlighting a need for equitable treatment of all community voices.

Matt Bolick, a local business owner, shared his perspective on the changes, acknowledging some inconveniences but emphasizing the positive effects on community engagement and safety. He noted an increase in families using bike lanes and a more pleasant atmosphere downtown, suggesting that the changes have fostered a more vibrant community environment.

Lillian Dinkins, representing her neighborhood, criticized the council's decision to cancel the project entirely, arguing that it disregarded the positive outcomes observed in areas north of Grand Avenue. She pointed out that traffic speeds had decreased and safety for pedestrians and cyclists had improved, urging the council to reconsider the decision and explore compromises rather than reverting to previous configurations.

Several residents echoed Dinkins' sentiments, emphasizing the importance of maintaining safety measures and the benefits of reduced traffic speeds. John Longley, a newcomer to the area, praised the changes for making the neighborhood quieter and safer, while Ryan, a business owner, reported no negative impacts on his operations, instead highlighting the increased safety for families and pedestrians.

The meeting also featured criticism of the council's handling of public comments, with some attendees expressing frustration over perceived dismissiveness from council members. Jordan Madsen called for a more inclusive dialogue, urging the council to listen to all constituents rather than just the loudest voices.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the community remains divided on the issue, with strong opinions on both sides regarding the future of the Fourth and Fifth Streets project. The council faces the challenge of balancing the needs of local businesses with the safety and preferences of residents, as they navigate the complexities of urban planning and community engagement.

In conclusion, the Grand Junction City Council's meeting highlighted the ongoing debate over the Fourth and Fifth Streets pilot project, with residents advocating for safety and community cohesion while expressing concerns about the council's decision-making process. The council's next steps will be crucial in addressing these community concerns and finding a path forward that respects the diverse opinions of Grand Junction's residents.